Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Shawn Springs

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-03-2006, 03:29 PM   #1
Meast
Special Teams
 
Meast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 116
Re: Shawn Springs

Quote:
Originally Posted by hesscl34 View Post
Cut Springs? You're nuts. The surgery was supposed to be a FIX, not a bandaid. That's why they did it. With time he'll get fully healthy again. Once he's good to go he's the best corner in the league. We would be fools to trade him.
Don't be a Homer, Hess It's Deangelo. Springs is not a superhuman but he is better than the alternative. Although Wright and Rumph look better, I don't know which I'd choose, they've both made decent plays, but probably the guy from the U.
Meast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2006, 03:31 PM   #2
hesscl34
Registered User
 
hesscl34's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Germantown, MD
Posts: 2,782
Re: Shawn Springs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Meast View Post
Don't be a Homer, Hess It's Deangelo. Springs is not a superhuman but he is better than the alternative. Although Wright and Rumph look better, I don't know which I'd choose, they've both made decent plays, but probably the guy from the U.
I can be a HOMER all I want! I'm a REDSKIN FAN!!!!
hesscl34 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2006, 09:51 PM   #3
Meast
Special Teams
 
Meast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 116
Re: Shawn Springs

Quote:
Originally Posted by hesscl34 View Post
I can be a HOMER all I want! I'm a REDSKIN FAN!!!!
I know I was kind of joking. my rabid homerism almost got me shitstomped this weekend
Meast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2006, 08:32 PM   #4
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
Re: Shawn Springs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Meast View Post
Don't be a Homer, Hess It's Deangelo. Springs is not a superhuman but he is better than the alternative. Although Wright and Rumph look better, I don't know which I'd choose, they've both made decent plays, but probably the guy from the U.
From Pro Football Prospectus 2006, "Shawn Springs was the top cornerback in the league according to our game charting numbers,"

Also from the same blurb: "expect the Redskins to have problems on third downs with slot receivers catching the ball right at the first down marker."

These guys really know what they are talking about.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2006, 08:47 PM   #5
MightyJoeGibbs
The Starter
 
MightyJoeGibbs's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: B-More, the backdoor for the Redskins Community
Age: 46
Posts: 1,087
Re: Shawn Springs

[quote=GTripp0012;223477]From Pro Football Prospectus 2006, "Shawn Springs was the top cornerback in the league according to our game charting numbers,"

Also from the same blurb: "expect the Redskins to have problems on third downs with slot receivers catching the ball right at the first down marker."

That is exactly what has plagued this defense all year. They arent rerouting or playing their guys tight enough. That assesment is dead on but to the defense side.
__________________
Maybe in order to understand mankind we have to look at that word itself. MANKIND. Basically, it's made up of two separate words "mank"and "ind." What do these words mean? It's a mystery and that's why so is mankind. --Jack Handy Deep Thoughts
MightyJoeGibbs is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:45 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.29580 seconds with 11 queries