![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 40
|
Re: Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage
So much for bringing in McIntosh, I saw him mis a tackle on addia, that he was right in front of. He may be another bust.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Age: 52
Posts: 5,311
|
Re: Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 47
Posts: 8,317
|
Re: Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage
I noticed you had a typo in a post of yours back in August. We're thinking of banning you for life.
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,674
|
Re: Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage
yea he played like 3 drives....plenty of time to see that he's a bust
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fairfax, VA
Age: 50
Posts: 4,261
|
Re: Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage
Quote:
If they lose tomorrow they should shake everything up. I am curious whether they will keep Vincent next year. It seems to me that he should be able to do the things that Clark did for Taylor last year (line him up, give him tips etc...). I am not saying that they will be buddies but Vincent seems like a good compliment to Taylor. Let Taylor seek and destroy while Vincent takes on more of the coverage duties. Hell, they should try Archuletta at LB, it couldn't hurt. I say change the whole deal. Go 3-4 with Carter and Archuletta as LB's. We need to get something out of that 60 million plus that was spent. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 40
|
Re: Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage
Now I know why they call you the Grimm Reaper. You went for the kill, within seconds.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fairfax, VA
Age: 50
Posts: 4,261
|
Re: Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage
Quote:
I was trying to think positive the other day so I e-mailed the Dexter on Danny White pic to some people. Someone asked me if that was a doll. I responded, "It was a quarterback when the ball was snapped". People say that it is bad to wish an injury. I don't want his career to end but if we put Romo out of the game, I would be the happiest guy on the east coast. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Age: 53
Posts: 114
|
Re: Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage
It was said on the radio a few weeks ago that Rocky made too many scheme mistakes in practice. I hope he has got it down now, because they need his talent in the lineup. Holdman can't tackle!
__________________
A fool finds no pleasure in understanding but delights in airing his own opinions. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
MVP
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lancaster,pa
Age: 64
Posts: 10,672
|
Re: Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage
this makes me laugh. the whole team has basically been out of position all year, and mcintosh cant get on the field because of it?
__________________
"It's better to be quiet and thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt." courtesy of 53fan |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|