ROMO??? Why not JC???

[memphisskin]

[QUOTE=TheBigD;236320]

Originally Posted by firstdown

quote]

No one said anything about the Fox5 report whether Gibbs is limiting AS to only some plays from his playbook. I believe it because all I've seen from the redskins this season is the same old dinks and dunks for short gains. I am a firm beliver that once your offense starts clicking your D just plays better for some reason. I think if the offense could do something the Redskins D is actaully a solid one, I think they are on the fields for too long. That same Fox5 report said that this might be the last season for Gibbs as a head coach of the Redskins pending the outcome at the end of the season.

Since we haven't seen 700 pages worth of plays, I'd say you're a dead-on genius about Gibbs limiting Saunders' playbook.

Our defense and offense are not helping each other, the Skins inconsistent offense has led to our defense being asked to do too much and the defense's inability to force turnovers has led to our offense being asked to generate too many long drives to score points. Its a chicken and egg argument with me, but we clearly need one unit to give us a spark and carry us and so far they've both underdelivered.

How Romo and Brunell each perform on Sunday will have a lot to do with when JC sees game action. If Romo outplays Brunell, then maybe he'll consider working JC into the gameplan. If Romo craps the bed, then JC will remain in mothballs, right next to David Patten, corner blitzes, TJ Duckett, and 690 pages of Saunders' playbook.