Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Are 21 and 31 over-rated?

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-30-2006, 09:47 PM   #1
hands11
Camp Scrub
 
hands11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 24
Re: Are 21 and 31 over-rated?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Grim21Reaper View Post
I think the problem with 21 is that, with Springs hurt and Archuletta a coverage liability, too many coverage duties are falling to Taylor. People who like to criticize him say, "Look what Burress and Toomer did to Taylor". Well Taylor should not be covering #1 and #2 receivers one on one. The Redskins defensive scheme is in complete disarray right now. Maybe it is because Springs is out, Clark & Stoudtmire are gone, Prieleau is on the shelf etc. But this defense is a shell of it's former self ('05, '04).

why doesnt anyone remember walt harris.

NFL.com - Walt Harris
hands11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2006, 09:56 PM   #2
onlydarksets
Playmaker
 
onlydarksets's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: all up in your business
Posts: 2,693
Re: Are 21 and 31 over-rated?

Quote:
Originally Posted by hands11 View Post
why doesnt anyone remember walt harris.

NFL.com - Walt Harris
Harris is having a great season in San Fran, but he was marginal here. He was great at missing tackles, though, which seems to have spread to the rest of the team.
onlydarksets is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.69714 seconds with 11 queries