Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Sports Junkies talking about a Campbell rumor

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-03-2006, 10:13 AM   #1
GhettoDogAllStars
Playmaker
 
GhettoDogAllStars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Denver
Age: 44
Posts: 2,762
Re: Sports Junkies talking about a Campbell rumor

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMalcolmConnection View Post
Brunell is the son Gibbs never had.
That really says it all, right there. It just seems like Gibbs has the biggest hard-on for Brunell than anyone ever had for anyone ever before.
__________________
To succeed in the world it is not enough to be stupid, you must also be well-mannered.
GhettoDogAllStars is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2006, 11:06 AM   #2
skinsfan69
Living Legend
 
skinsfan69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,591
Re: Sports Junkies talking about a Campbell rumor

Quote:
Originally Posted by GhettoDogAllStars View Post
That really says it all, right there. It just seems like Gibbs has the biggest hard-on for Brunell than anyone ever had for anyone ever before.
LOL! I think Brunell caught Gibbs cheating on his wife. But remeber Gibbs has a history of this. Remember Thiesmann's last year? He was terrible. So was Rypien during the 92 season. The only guy he gave a hook to was Jay S. And Ramsey does not count.
skinsfan69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:14 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.30038 seconds with 11 queries