Potential Offseason Cuts and Cap Savings

[Beemnseven]

They would more than make up the $6.5 mil they'd lose by cutting Archuleta with dumping Brunell, Daniels and Wynn. ($6.73 million)

Can anyone honestly say there would be any noticeable difference with the latter two off the team?

[Sheriff Gonna Getcha]

Originally Posted by Beemnseven

They would more than make up the $6.5 mil they'd lose by cutting Archuleta with dumping Brunell, Daniels and Wynn. ($6.73 million)

Can anyone honestly say there would be any noticeable difference with the latter two off the team?

Maybe he'll be so miserable that he'll buy his way out of the contract to go to Chicago.

[hooskins]

Originally Posted by Sheriff Gonna Getcha

Maybe he'll be so miserable that he'll buy his way out of the contract to go to Chicago.

You think anyone is gonna want him after the way he has looked this year?

[hooskins]

Do you guys realize we are gonna be in huge trouble in a couple years when ARE's and AA's contracts start becoming really expensive. I really hope ARE will restructure then, he seems really committed to the team.

[BrunellMVP?]

Originally Posted by hooskins

Do you guys realize we are gonna be in huge trouble in a couple years when ARE's and AA's contracts start becoming really expensive. I really hope ARE will restructure then, he seems really committed to the team.

THis may seem incredibly naive...but we've been hearing about how the salary cap is going to catch up to us for years- how our spending (however stupid) is going to kill us- etc. but last time I checked, every year we go out and spend money to aquire whatever toys we prize (with almost no regard for cost). it seems to me, as players can always restructure, and salaries can be spread over years, that no matter how much we spend, we will always make it work. The only time, that i see this system failing (in a financial sense-bc it has already failed in on-field performance) is if Synder sells, and the new owner doesn't subscribe to his push payments into perpetuity formula. is my logic fatally flawed here??