Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Breaking News - JC to start Sunday

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-13-2006, 06:39 PM   #1
Mc2guy
Special Teams
 
Mc2guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Burke, VA
Age: 49
Posts: 287
Re: Breaking News - JC to start Sunday

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
If that's true...then hes doing it out of desperation. If its a move out of desperation, the season REALLY is over.

I really wanted to stick it to Tampa. Oh well, sacrifices made for the learning curve.

With all due respect...you sir are Delooooooosional (best Lewis Black imitation) if you thought MB was going to "stick it" to Tampa.

The season was also over in August when it was obvious that our offense couldn't learn the playbook in the preseason and the defense starting looking like swiss cheese. BTW, just because no one agrees with you doesn't mean you have to turn into a sourpuss and start poopin' on everyone else faint glimmer of hope that this year can turn into something positive.

Just as you desperately clung to any remote iota of positive play from MB all season, I expect you to give JC the same benefit of the doubt.
Mc2guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2006, 07:12 PM   #2
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
Re: Breaking News - JC to start Sunday

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mc2guy View Post
With all due respect...you sir are Delooooooosional (best Lewis Black imitation) if you thought MB was going to "stick it" to Tampa.

The season was also over in August when it was obvious that our offense couldn't learn the playbook in the preseason and the defense starting looking like swiss cheese. BTW, just because no one agrees with you doesn't mean you have to turn into a sourpuss and start poopin' on everyone else faint glimmer of hope that this year can turn into something positive.

Just as you desperately clung to any remote iota of positive play from MB all season, I expect you to give JC the same benefit of the doubt.
Except to this day it would be just as deloooooooosional to think that we'd be any better than 2-7 with Campbell at QB. The games we lost we didn't lose because of the QB position, and the Jacksonville game we won because of it.

You can't solve all your teams problems with a QB change, espicially when the QB wasn't the issue.

Here's a list of guys who have had worse seasons than MB:

Jon Jansen
Al Saunders
Derrick Dockery
Chris Cooley (my favorite Redskin)
Christian Fauria
Gregg Williams
Adam Archuleta
Sean Taylor
Carlos Rogers (I think he will improve drastically in the 2nd half of the year)
Warrick Holdman
Lemar Marshall (my 2nd favorite Redskin)
Marcus Washington
Andre Carter
Phillip Daniels

Good, now that we have Brunell out of the way, what are we going to do with those guys? And who is going to be Campbell's replacement when he doesnt throw 4 TDs this week?

According to advanced statistics Brunell is personally responsible for 36.6 points this season (4.1 DPAR/G) (above replacement, or a guy responsible for exactly 0, and yes you can be below replacement level). Until further proof, Campbell would fall at the replacement QB range (0 DPAR/G). In his prime, Campbell is projected to produce 6.1 DPAR/G. That means Campbell at his prime would be responsible for 55.0 points this season up until this point. But he's got a ways to go to make his projection so you are almost certainly taking a hit in the present.

So in the present, I would expect our average pts/game to decrease by 4 for the rest of the year, slowly increasing as JC gets expierence.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2006, 07:58 PM   #3
hesscl34
Registered User
 
hesscl34's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Germantown, MD
Posts: 2,782
Re: Breaking News - JC to start Sunday

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
Except to this day it would be just as deloooooooosional to think that we'd be any better than 2-7 with Campbell at QB. The games we lost we didn't lose because of the QB position, and the Jacksonville game we won because of it.

You can't solve all your teams problems with a QB change, espicially when the QB wasn't the issue.

Here's a list of guys who have had worse seasons than MB:

Jon Jansen
Al Saunders
Derrick Dockery
Chris Cooley (my favorite Redskin)
Christian Fauria
Gregg Williams
Adam Archuleta
Sean Taylor
Carlos Rogers (I think he will improve drastically in the 2nd half of the year)
Warrick Holdman
Lemar Marshall (my 2nd favorite Redskin)
Marcus Washington
Andre Carter
Phillip Daniels

Good, now that we have Brunell out of the way, what are we going to do with those guys? And who is going to be Campbell's replacement when he doesnt throw 4 TDs this week?

According to advanced statistics Brunell is personally responsible for 36.6 points this season (4.1 DPAR/G) (above replacement, or a guy responsible for exactly 0, and yes you can be below replacement level). Until further proof, Campbell would fall at the replacement QB range (0 DPAR/G). In his prime, Campbell is projected to produce 6.1 DPAR/G. That means Campbell at his prime would be responsible for 55.0 points this season up until this point. But he's got a ways to go to make his projection so you are almost certainly taking a hit in the present.

So in the present, I would expect our average pts/game to decrease by 4 for the rest of the year, slowly increasing as JC gets expierence.
OH, Hi! It's my new long lost twin again!!
hesscl34 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2006, 12:15 AM   #4
Sheriff Gonna Getcha
Franchise Player
 
Sheriff Gonna Getcha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 47
Posts: 8,317
Re: Breaking News - JC to start Sunday

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
According to advanced statistics Brunell is personally responsible for 36.6 points this season (4.1 DPAR/G) (above replacement, or a guy responsible for exactly 0, and yes you can be below replacement level). Until further proof, Campbell would fall at the replacement QB range (0 DPAR/G).
According to that site's DPAR rankings, Brunell is better than:

Tom Brady
Eli Manning
Carson Palmer
Rex Grossman
Chad Pennington
Tony Romo
Matt Hasselbeck
Michael Vick

There goes that site's credibility.
Sheriff Gonna Getcha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2006, 12:19 AM   #5
illdefined
Playmaker
 
illdefined's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: nyc
Age: 50
Posts: 2,631
Re: Breaking News - JC to start Sunday

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheriff Gonna Getcha View Post
According to that site's DPAR rankings, Brunell is better than:

Tom Brady
Eli Manning
Carson Palmer
Rex Grossman
Chad Pennington
Tony Romo
Matt Hasselbeck
Michael Vick

There goes that site's credibility.
course not, those guys don't have Ladell 'Breakout' Betts. thanks for the research.
__________________
a fan. not a cheerleader.
illdefined is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.31071 seconds with 11 queries