WHat i feel the redskins should do for the offseason

[carlosrogerisdaman22]

Originally Posted by Paintrain

Since when has being cheap been an offseaon issue for the Redskins? '$=Cap'-Vinny Cerrato..

Deon Grant is adequate at best at safety, paying Clements won't be a problem.. He's a bit inconsistent but I'd feel better with Clements, Springs, Taylor, Rogers than Springs, Rogers, Taylor, Grant. We also don't know how Taylor, who is a headcase, will relate to Grant but he and Springs already have a history together..

redskins dont have the cash to pay clements, if you pay him 55 mill
then forgeet about signing the first round pick , dockery is lost, betts and duckett, and no other free agents sign.

[That Guy]

Originally Posted by carlosrogerisdaman22

redskins dont have the cash to pay clements, if you pay him 55 mill
then forgeet about signing the first round pick , dockery is lost, betts and duckett, and no other free agents sign.

clements first year would only cost 3-4mill, that's brunell and wynn. i don't think dock betts and duckett are going to get the deals you think they'll get.

[JoeRedskin]

Originally Posted by carlosrogerisdaman22

redskins dont have the cash to pay clements, if you pay him 55 mill
then forgeet about signing the first round pick , dockery is lost, betts and duckett, and no other free agents sign.

Okay, if your are going to make claims like these you really should break down the numbers if you want to be taken seriously:

- Where you getting the 55M number on Clements AND how are you asserting the contract will be structured?

- IF you are seriously suggesting that Gibbs & Co. are incapable of restructuring existing contracts and new contracts in a manner that would enable them to sign clements, a first round pick, dockery and (betts or duckett), THEN please tell me what you expect each to demand in a signing bonus and tell me why Brunnell, Wynn, Samuels, Jansen and/or a host of other existing contracts can't be restructured or terminated to accomodate these bonuses. Otherwise you are really just talking out your ass.

[carlosrogerisdaman22]

Originally Posted by JoeRedskin

Okay, if your are going to make claims like these you really should break down the numbers if you want to be taken seriously:

- Where you getting the 55M number on Clements AND how are you asserting the contract will be structured?

- IF you are seriously suggesting that Gibbs & Co. are incapable of restructuring existing contracts and new contracts in a manner that would enable them to sign clements, a first round pick, dockery and (betts or duckett), THEN please tell me what you expect each to demand in a signing bonus and tell me why Brunnell, Wynn, Samuels, Jansen and/or a host of other existing contracts can't be restructured or terminated to accomodate these bonuses. Otherwise you are really just talking out your ass.

simple last offseason clements was a free agent the bills franchised him he was looking for a 60 milion deal
champ bailey got 64 Mill 3 years ago , Clements want 55-60 million , they are abou tthe same age.

[JoeRedskin]

Originally Posted by carlosrogerisdaman22

simple last offseason clements was a free agent the bills franchised him he was looking for a 60 milion deal
champ bailey got 64 Mill 3 years ago , Clements want 55-60 million , they are abou tthe same age.

As I said, how are you structuring the money? He wants 60M in the first year? The first three years? Neither of those are gonna happen. Not from us, not from anybody.

Again, you fail to explain how contracts will be structured or the specific financial year by year implications of your proposed actions.