Michigan or Florida and why the BCS sucks

[Daseal]

Im a Florida fan, but this should be a rematch. I thought even after the big game where Michigan lost by 3 in Ohio State the final should be a rematch. USC lost to some virtually unknown by quite a few points, but Michigan only lost by 3 to the #1 team on the road. Hard for me to say they slip to 3 or 4 after losing to #1 by 3.

Put this at a neutral site and we might see a different result. The point of the BCS is to have the two best teams. Those teams, hands down, are Michigan and USC.

I agree, they NEED to have a playoff system. Not like these guys take finals anyways.

[12thMan]

Originally Posted by Daseal

Im a Florida fan, but this should be a rematch. I thought even after the big game where Michigan lost by 3 in Ohio State the final should be a rematch. USC lost to some virtually unknown by quite a few points, but Michigan only lost by 3 to the #1 team on the road. Hard for me to say they slip to 3 or 4 after losing to #1 by 3.

Put this at a neutral site and we might see a different result. The point of the BCS is to have the two best teams. Those teams, hands down, are Michigan and USC.

I agree, they NEED to have a playoff system. Not like these guys take finals anyways.

But a more fundamental question is, why should a team that finished second in their conferance play for the national championship? Secondly, when is the SEC going to get their chance to play in the big dance?
No way Michigan should have another shot to play Ohio...because they already have.