Im done....Gibbs must go.

[MTK]

Personally I have no problem distinguishing Gibbs 1.0 and Gibbs 2.0.

Regardless of if his name was Joe Gibbs I wouldn't want him fired at the end of this season.

Year 1 was a mess but I can understand that, first time back in a long time, he needed to adjust, and he needed a chance to bring in his own players.

Year 2 playoffs: no complaints there.

Year 3 has been a mess but I'd prefer to see him attempt to get this turned around rather than starting over at square one with a new staff.

That's my take in a nutshell.

[JWsleep]

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

Personally I have no problem distinguishing Gibbs 1.0 and Gibbs 2.0.

Regardless of if his name was Joe Gibbs I wouldn't want him fired at the end of this season.

Year 1 was a mess but I can understand that, first time back in a long time, he needed to adjust, and he needed a chance to bring in his own players.

Year 2 playoffs: no complaints there.

Year 3 has been a mess but I'd prefer to see him attempt to get this turned around rather than starting over at square one with a new staff.

That's my take in a nutshell.

Well put. I fully agree.

Im done...with this thread!

[The Zimmermans]

They were talking about firing Cohwer in the two seasons prior to the superbowl............imagine that

[GhettoDogAllStars]

Nobody voted "yes"? Where's paul and charlie?

Of course I voted no. As somebody once said before, "you don't get rid of your coach unless there is a better replacement." Who is better than Gibbs, and is available?

[paulskinsfan]

Originally Posted by GhettoDogAllStars

Nobody voted "yes"? Where's paul and charlie?

Of course I voted no. As somebody once said before, "you don't get rid of your coach unless there is a better replacement." Who is better than Gibbs, and is available?

Im not gonna vote because the wording of the poll is biased. No point in voting in this, and I tried to post suggested polls but apparently no one listened.

[MTK]

Originally Posted by paulskinsfan

Im not gonna vote because the wording of the poll is biased. No point in voting in this, and I tried to post suggested polls but apparently no one listened.

How would you want it worded to get the results you want?

Seems to be simple and straight forward to me. You want Gibbs gone, right? So why not vote yes?

Let's not dance around the issue, do you want him here next year or not?

[paulskinsfan]

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

How would you want it worded to get the results you want?

Seems to be simple and straight forward to me. You want Gibbs gone, right? So why not vote yes?

Let's not dance around the issue, do you want him here next year or not?

Matt I did 2 posts on how this poll should be worded, you ignored them both and worded the way you wanted so that the majority would vote with you.

[MTK]

Originally Posted by paulskinsfan

Matt I did 2 posts on how this poll should be worded, you ignored them both and worded the way you wanted so that the majority would vote with you.

You started off this thread saying Gibbs should step down.

Seemed like a pretty simple take, now you're trying to dance around the issue.

Yes or No, very simple.

I don't need to word the poll a special way to get anyone to vote with me. Face it, the majority of fans don't want him gone. Simple as that.

[paulskinsfan]

People are never gonna vote Yes In a Should Gibbs be Fired Poll, they just wont based on how much he has meant to the organization, its like asking a Penn State if Joe Pa should be fired. The poll should ask:

Do you have faith that the current coaching staff can right the ship?

[MTK]

Originally Posted by paulskinsfan

People are never gonna vote Yes In a Should Gibbs be Fired Poll, they just wont based on how much he has meant to the organization, its like asking a Penn State if Joe Pa should be fired. The poll should ask:

Do you have faith that the current coaching staff can right the ship?

And you don't think that poll would yield a similar result?

C'mon man, you're kidding me right?

[paulskinsfan]

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

And you don't think that poll would yield a similar result?

C'mon man, you're kidding me right?

No, I think fair minded people would vote No to the last question I posed, while the same people would not "fire" Joe Gibbs. You hear what you want to hear Matt.

[MTK]

Originally Posted by paulskinsfan

No, I think fair minded people would vote No to the last question I posed, while the same people would not "fire" Joe Gibbs. You hear what you want to hear Matt.

Fine I'll start another poll, care to wager on how it will go?

[MTK]

everyone please re-vote on our new poll sponsored and perfectly worded for optimal results by paulskinsfan

[ArtMonkDrillz]

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

everyone please re-vote on our new poll sponsored and perfectly worded for optimal results by paulskinsfan

you changed it up on me mid-vote. Looks like my vote went in the wrong answer.

[ArtMonkDrillz]

The description under your name is pretty ironic, CC. There are still 4 games left to play but it's already "on to '07," but it isn't because the coaching staff is doing a bad job?