Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Campbell: More Pluses Than Negatives

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-03-2006, 07:35 PM   #1
jdlea
Playmaker
 
jdlea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, VA
Age: 42
Posts: 3,109
Re: Campbell: More Pluses Than Negatives

Campbell definitely did make some mistakes today, however, that's because it was his third start. He's gonna have days like this. I was pissed about the pick down on the goal line. I think if he doesn't get hit, he makes that throw for the td. The problem on that play was Betts trying to pick up the wrong man. That's where this team misses Clinton Portis the most. Clinton would've eaten that guys lunch.
jdlea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2006, 08:15 PM   #2
hooskins
Most Interesting Man in the World
 
hooskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Age: 39
Posts: 8,606
Re: Campbell: More Pluses Than Negatives

Another thing about Campbell is that he drops back too far. He needs to take 3-5 step drops and no more. He is taking about 7 step drops, no line can hold that up. Combine that with his windup, it is easy to get to him.
__________________
Vacancy
hooskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2006, 08:32 PM   #3
soccercycbk
Camp Scrub
 
soccercycbk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 60
Re: Campbell: More Pluses Than Negatives

Quote:
Originally Posted by hooskins View Post
Another thing about Campbell is that he drops back too far. He needs to take 3-5 step drops and no more. He is taking about 7 step drops, no line can hold that up. Combine that with his windup, it is easy to get to him.
isn't the number of step drops pre-determined? i'm pretty sure that amount is part of the play but i could be wrong...
soccercycbk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2006, 08:35 PM   #4
hooskins
Most Interesting Man in the World
 
hooskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Age: 39
Posts: 8,606
Re: Campbell: More Pluses Than Negatives

Quote:
Originally Posted by soccercycbk View Post
isn't the number of step drops pre-determined? i'm pretty sure that amount is part of the play but i could be wrong...
Then the playcalling should be adjusted because it seems like he is dropping back way to far right into the path of the DEs
__________________
Vacancy
hooskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2006, 11:47 AM   #5
Monkeydad
Living Legend
 
Monkeydad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 47
Posts: 17,460
Re: Campbell: More Pluses Than Negatives

Quote:
Originally Posted by soccercycbk View Post
isn't the number of step drops pre-determined? i'm pretty sure that amount is part of the play but i could be wrong...
Yes it is. It probably just looks like a further drop because he's so tall and has long legs.

Did anyone else notice his really low crouch under center? You can barely see his head behind the linemen and he's just about on one knee. Hey, if it works for him...let him do it. Maybe it keeps his hammys stretched for when he scrambles.
Monkeydad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2006, 11:50 AM   #6
12thMan
MVP
 
12thMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,460
Re: Campbell: More Pluses Than Negatives

Quote:
Originally Posted by Buster View Post
Yes it is. It probably just looks like a further drop because he's so tall and has long legs.

Did anyone else notice his really low crouch under center? You can barely see his head behind the linemen and he's just about on one knee. Hey, if it works for him...let him do it. Maybe it keeps his hammys stretched for when he scrambles.
Post game he said he's doing that because he doesn't want CR to alter his snap that much, but it's something they'll work on together during the off season.
12thMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2006, 11:50 PM   #7
Pudge
Camp Scrub
 
Pudge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 6
Re: Campbell: More Pluses Than Negatives

I think the two biggest negatives you can take away from Campbell today are 1) He didn't adjust well to the blitz. But then you gotta ask yourself, how much is that his fault, and how much is that the Blockers and Rabach for not giving him some more help.

2) He didn't seem like he was going thru his progressions fully. It seemed like Moss and Cooley were his primary targets for most of the day, and he really had trouble completing passes to anybody besides Moss. Moss caught 7 of 9 passes thrown his way. The other receivers: Lloyd, Cooley, and Randle-El caught a total of 6 of 20 combined. Not very good.

I think Campbell was acceptable considering it was his 3rd start. It would have been a tall order for him to get them the W late, although he had several chances. But I think you can also say coaching held him back a bit.
__________________
Aaron "Pudge" Freeman
http://www.falcfans.com
Pudge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2006, 11:50 AM   #8
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
Re: Campbell: More Pluses Than Negatives

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pudge View Post
But then you gotta ask yourself, how much is that his fault, and how much is that the Blockers and Rabach for not giving him some more help.
LOL. I like how we've seperated Rabach from the people who actually block.

I think he's an adequate center, but far too often he's standing around after a play.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2006, 12:01 PM   #9
Schneed10
A Dude
 
Schneed10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Newtown Square, PA
Age: 47
Posts: 12,458
Re: Campbell: More Pluses Than Negatives

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pudge View Post
I think the two biggest negatives you can take away from Campbell today are 1) He didn't adjust well to the blitz. But then you gotta ask yourself, how much is that his fault, and how much is that the Blockers and Rabach for not giving him some more help.

2) He didn't seem like he was going thru his progressions fully. It seemed like Moss and Cooley were his primary targets for most of the day, and he really had trouble completing passes to anybody besides Moss. Moss caught 7 of 9 passes thrown his way. The other receivers: Lloyd, Cooley, and Randle-El caught a total of 6 of 20 combined. Not very good.

I think Campbell was acceptable considering it was his 3rd start. It would have been a tall order for him to get them the W late, although he had several chances. But I think you can also say coaching held him back a bit.
Good post. Especially point number 2. I saw him doing some things that young QBs often do - staring down the receiver they intend to throw to. Far too often Campbell just focused in on Moss and failed to hold the safety in the center of the field with his eyes. He has to learn to look off the safety. It's the WR's job to beat the corner, it's the QB's job to beat the safety.

Consequently, because he was staring down receivers, he often didn't move to a 2nd or 3rd read on a play. He'd get fixated on Moss, and wouldn't even realize that Cooley was wide open on the other side of the field.

These are things young QBs often deal with, and are very coachable. That is, of course, if your coaches can focus on what's important and stop bickering back and forth over what the offensive philosophy should be.
__________________
God made certain people to play football. He was one of them.
Schneed10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.19962 seconds with 11 queries