Another poor play calling game by Gibbs

[61cad]

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

It's hard to win when you spot a team 14 easy points off turnovers.

Not when you have 1st goal from the 3 and your down by 5. That would have won the game.

[MTK]

Originally Posted by 61cad

Not when you have 1st goal from the 3 and your down by 5. That would have won the game.

Or you could say it wouldn't have come down to that if you take away the 14 gimme points.

[61cad]

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

Or you could say it wouldn't have come down to that if you take away the 14 gimme points.

So, not getting into the end zone with a 1st in goal on the 3 is OK?

It's justified because of the the 2 picks?

Keep drinking that Gibbs Coolaide.

[MTK]

Originally Posted by 61cad

So, not getting into the end zone with a 1st in goal on the 3 is OK?

It's justified because of the the 2 picks?

Keep drinking that Gibbs Coolaide.

Getting in was not acceptable.

Just as unacceptable as throwing 2 early picks that lead to 14 easy points.

Both situations lead to the loss. If that's kool-aid please pass the grape kind please.

[babodacious]

I am new here but does anyone else wonder why we can't narrow our playcalling down to the plays we called in the first half of the game against the falcons. A healthy dose of either betts or portis and then go for the big play with santana. I realize that with campbell we will struggle(like we already have) but i believe that is what we need.

[MTK]

Originally Posted by babodacious

I am new here but does anyone else wonder why we can't narrow our playcalling down to the plays we called in the first half of the game against the falcons. A healthy dose of either betts or portis and then go for the big play with santana. I realize that with campbell we will struggle(like we already have) but i believe that is what we need.

Did you watch the game yesterday? That's exactly what we saw. They pounded the ball and took a few shots down the field.

Welcome by the way.

[skinsguy]

Originally Posted by 61cad

So, not getting into the end zone with a 1st in goal on the 3 is OK?

It's justified because of the the 2 picks?

Keep drinking that Gibbs Coolaide.

So throwing two INTs is ok? Stop drinking the hateraide.

[61cad]

Originally Posted by skinsguy

So throwing two INTs is ok? Stop drinking the hateraide.

Which part of over coming 21 point and possibly winning the game did you miss?

Hateraide for ALL!!!!!

[MTK]

Originally Posted by skinsguy

So throwing two INTs is ok? Stop drinking the hateraide.

Just nevermind. He's still in 2005 with his CBA talk.

Do they make dummyaide yet?

[61cad]

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

Just nevermind. He's still in 2005 with his CBA talk.

Do they make dummyaide yet?

As dumb as justifying the 2 picks vs winning the game when the Skins had a chance.

Just stupid!

[MTK]

Originally Posted by 61cad

As dumb as justifying the 2 picks vs winning the game when the Skins had a chance.

Just stupid!

Not quite.

Nice try though.

[skinsguy]

Originally Posted by 61cad

As dumb as justifying the 2 picks vs winning the game when the Skins had a chance.

Just stupid!

Hhhhhmmm.....this is too easy! LOL!!!

[skinsguy]

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

Just nevermind. He's still in 2005 with his CBA talk.

Do they make dummyaide yet?

I bet he still wears those 1970's leisure suits with the butterfly collar!

[SmootSmack]

Originally Posted by skinsguy

I bet he still wears those 1970's leisure suits with the butterfly collar!

He'd be big pimpin for sure!

[AlvinWalton'sNeckBrace]

Originally Posted by skinsguy

I bet he still wears those 1970's leisure suits with the butterfly collar!

I like those collars!! hah...used to have a Bama jacket from the 70's, and I miss that thing really bad