![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Roanoke, VA
Posts: 3,508
|
Re: Casserly Keeping his options open
Quote:
Also, I do agree that you have a better chance of building depth through the draft but that's sort of countered by having a higher quality starting roster, in my opion that was built through FA. Personally, I like a nice even mix of draft picks and FA. I have a"win now" mindset though which favors getting immediate starters (FA) to fill gaps in the roster.
__________________
"I hope I'm getting better. I hope you haven't seen my best." - Jim Zorn |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 721
|
Re: Casserly Keeping his options open
Quote:
I agree that getting some free agents is a must but to go at it the way the Redskins do with as much disregard for the draft does not make sense to me as far as long range planning goes. I will say the one area I wished the Redskins would spend above average money on and do it early is a kicker if Suisham does not work out. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: West VA
Posts: 726
|
Re: Casserly Keeping his options open
Quote:
The problem IMO is that draft picks let you get a player locked in for 4-6 years at a relatively cheap price. An overpriced FA hits the cap alot harder with bigger signing bonus and salary. Look at Cooley's contract, he was really cheap the past few years so we could use money to acquire FAs. If you give away picks, or if they don't make the team, then you've missed out on cheap talent. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|