Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Are the recievers getting open

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-26-2006, 09:17 AM   #1
skinsfan69
Living Legend
 
skinsfan69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,591
Re: Are the recievers getting open

Quote:
Originally Posted by cpayne5 View Post
We've got the possession receiver that we need. He wears #47.

As for the small receivers not being big targets, Santana Moss plays the deep ball better than many many (most?) larger receivers.

I don't think a thing needs to be changed with the receivers. Just let them gel with 17. Continuity is key.
I agree here. As much as I would like to see a 6'4 WR I think a full offseason with the same group would help out a ton. Moss and JC are just not on the same page.
skinsfan69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-2006, 09:35 PM   #2
AlvinWalton'sNeckBrace
Impact Rookie
 
AlvinWalton'sNeckBrace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Fayetteville, NC
Age: 41
Posts: 896
Re: Are the recievers getting open

Well, for one thing, there seemed to be a lot of drops. Part of this is because Campbell throws the ball about 100 miles an hour...seriously, I think he would break my hand if I tried to catch one of his passes.
AlvinWalton'sNeckBrace is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-2006, 11:10 PM   #3
wilsowilso
Registered User
 
wilsowilso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Age: 52
Posts: 2,841
Re: Are the recievers getting open

This is a very very very important thread. I don't really have any answers to the question, but I have seen this type of game many times before. Why was the deep ball or vertical passing game completely shut down???? I mean why was it figured out completely and our Recievers might as well have been a couple of little bitches. The O was gameplanned for draft picks in the second half and overtime today.
wilsowilso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-2006, 11:15 PM   #4
The Huddle
Camp Scrub
 
The Huddle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Arrington, Va.
Posts: 99
Re: Are the recievers getting open

It's going to take a while. Campbell looks promising, but we knew when the team drafted him that he was going to be a fairly raw project. No one thought he was going to walk in and start lighting it up right away. Six starts isn't nearly enough time to start saying there's a problem with with the recievers. I mean, it's fairly obvious that Bryant is a bust (IMO), but beyond that Campbell needs time to generate some chemestry with Cooley, Moss, etc.
The Huddle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-2006, 11:30 PM   #5
steveo395
The Starter
 
steveo395's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,674
Re: Are the recievers getting open

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Huddle View Post
It's going to take a while. Campbell looks promising, but we knew when the team drafted him that he was going to be a fairly raw project. No one thought he was going to walk in and start lighting it up right away. Six starts isn't nearly enough time to start saying there's a problem with with the recievers. I mean, it's fairly obvious that Bryant is a bust (IMO), but beyond that Campbell needs time to generate some chemestry with Cooley, Moss, etc.
who is bryant
__________________

steveo395 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-2006, 11:19 PM   #6
wilsowilso
Registered User
 
wilsowilso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Age: 52
Posts: 2,841
Re: Are the recievers getting open

If our recievers got in a fight with my 15 pound dog today those high paid punks would lose. What an awful joke they were today? Bad bad badbad bad and bad.
wilsowilso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-2006, 11:37 PM   #7
The Huddle
Camp Scrub
 
The Huddle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Arrington, Va.
Posts: 99
Re: Are the recievers getting open

I meant Lloyd, sorry, fingers got ahead of me.
The Huddle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-2006, 11:44 PM   #8
Redskin
Impact Rookie
 
Redskin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: University of South Carolina
Age: 37
Posts: 577
Re: Are the recievers getting open

Its not that our recievers are not getting open, Campbell is making a lot of bad passes were he tries to throw of his back foot, rushing the throw when he has tons of time, or he commits himself to one reciever and doesent look at others that could be open. All Rookie mistakes that time will mend
__________________
University Of South Carolina '11
Go Cocks and Go Skins
#21#RIP Sean Taylor a TRUE Redskin#21#
<--Hey wheres my green approval rating?
Redskin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-2006, 09:10 AM   #9
redsk1
The Starter
 
redsk1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,351
Re: Are the recievers getting open

In order for us to become a good offensive team we are going to have to get the ball in our playmakers hands. We have great WR's. Let's not overthink this. JC is young and is learning but is having a hard time getting the ball out to the WR's consistently. We have turned the corner in regards to running the ball now we've got to improve in the explosive play of our WR's.

IMO, it's not that their not open.
redsk1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2006, 01:30 PM   #10
freddyg12
Playmaker
 
freddyg12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,540
Re: Are the recievers getting open

Before we blame the recievers, let's remember that JC is developing on the job. I recall reading that he still throws too late on many routes, waits for recievers to get open & then throws, rather than throwing in their break they way the play is designed. Sometimes recievers are only open for a short window before the play breaks down. That said, our wr's don't seem to do a good job of coming back to the ball when the route is over. I would've expected ARE to get more short passes coming back for the ball.
Unless Loyd shows great improvement next year, I don't see him as being a dependable wr. He'll make a big catch now & then, but doesn't seem to be in tune w/the O most of the time.
freddyg12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2006, 01:43 PM   #11
firstdown
Living Legend
 
firstdown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: chesapeake, va
Age: 62
Posts: 15,817
Re: Are the recievers getting open

Their size is not the problem its the fact that the coaches pulled Brunell just when he was starting to hit his WR's for a QB with no experence.
firstdown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2006, 01:52 PM   #12
riggoraider
Special Teams
 
riggoraider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: D.C. area
Posts: 179
Re: Are the recievers getting open

Quote:
Originally Posted by firstdown View Post
Their size is not the problem its the fact that the coaches pulled Brunell just when he was starting to hit his WR's for a QB with no experence.
Please take a look at successful passing team receiver mix a bigger receiver is a definite need. I think that pulling Brunell was a mistake also. Some people are riding high on Campbell and knocking Brunell when Brunell was actually having a better season that Campbell is producing for us, which proves to me that beauty IS in the eye of the beholder.
riggoraider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2006, 02:50 PM   #13
firstdown
Living Legend
 
firstdown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: chesapeake, va
Age: 62
Posts: 15,817
Re: Are the recievers getting open

Quote:
Originally Posted by riggoraider View Post
Please take a look at successful passing team receiver mix a bigger receiver is a definite need. I think that pulling Brunell was a mistake also. Some people are riding high on Campbell and knocking Brunell when Brunell was actually having a better season that Campbell is producing for us, which proves to me that beauty IS in the eye of the beholder.
I was joking about Brunell and he may have been pulled a game or two too early but this is very god experence that JC needs. Its better that he makes the mistakes now when they do not count as much then having him making them next season. Yes he will still have alot to learn next year but every snap this year helps him become a better QB next year. I would say Cooley is our big WR and can be that large target for JC and that is not one of our problems right now. I was trying to watch this week to see if JC was missing open WR's but its hard to tell on TV. I have seen a few he has missed but that is another reason why these games are so important for him to learn. It also gives the coaches film for them to review with him pointing out stuff he missed or thing he could have done better.
firstdown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2006, 03:02 PM   #14
riggoraider
Special Teams
 
riggoraider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: D.C. area
Posts: 179
Re: Are the recievers getting open

Quote:
Originally Posted by firstdown View Post
I was joking about Brunell and he may have been pulled a game or two too early but this is very god experence that JC needs. Its better that he makes the mistakes now when they do not count as much then having him making them next season. Yes he will still have alot to learn next year but every snap this year helps him become a better QB next year. I would say Cooley is our big WR and can be that large target for JC and that is not one of our problems right now. I was trying to watch this week to see if JC was missing open WR's but its hard to tell on TV. I have seen a few he has missed but that is another reason why these games are so important for him to learn. It also gives the coaches film for them to review with him pointing out stuff he missed or thing he could have done better.
Being that JC is going to be our QB of the future I really hope that he is just going through growing pains but right now he is reminding me of Andre Ware. I agree that the move to Campbell was a move for the future but it should of been made when we were eliminated from all playoff hopes. The NFC had some awful records this year and with Brunell I think that we would have had more wins than with Campbell and maybe would have made the playoffs because of the improved line play late in the season.

And oh by the way Cooley is not a WR
riggoraider is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:42 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.20802 seconds with 11 queries