![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,591
|
Re: Are the recievers getting open
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Fayetteville, NC
Age: 41
Posts: 896
|
Re: Are the recievers getting open
Well, for one thing, there seemed to be a lot of drops. Part of this is because Campbell throws the ball about 100 miles an hour...seriously, I think he would break my hand if I tried to catch one of his passes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Age: 52
Posts: 2,841
|
Re: Are the recievers getting open
This is a very very very important thread. I don't really have any answers to the question, but I have seen this type of game many times before. Why was the deep ball or vertical passing game completely shut down???? I mean why was it figured out completely and our Recievers might as well have been a couple of little bitches. The O was gameplanned for draft picks in the second half and overtime today.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Arrington, Va.
Posts: 99
|
Re: Are the recievers getting open
It's going to take a while. Campbell looks promising, but we knew when the team drafted him that he was going to be a fairly raw project. No one thought he was going to walk in and start lighting it up right away. Six starts isn't nearly enough time to start saying there's a problem with with the recievers. I mean, it's fairly obvious that Bryant is a bust (IMO), but beyond that Campbell needs time to generate some chemestry with Cooley, Moss, etc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,674
|
Re: Are the recievers getting open
Quote:
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Age: 52
Posts: 2,841
|
Re: Are the recievers getting open
If our recievers got in a fight with my 15 pound dog today those high paid punks would lose. What an awful joke they were today? Bad bad badbad bad and bad.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Arrington, Va.
Posts: 99
|
Re: Are the recievers getting open
I meant Lloyd, sorry, fingers got ahead of me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: University of South Carolina
Age: 37
Posts: 577
|
Re: Are the recievers getting open
Its not that our recievers are not getting open, Campbell is making a lot of bad passes were he tries to throw of his back foot, rushing the throw when he has tons of time, or he commits himself to one reciever and doesent look at others that could be open. All Rookie mistakes that time will mend
__________________
University Of South Carolina '11 Go Cocks and Go Skins #21#RIP Sean Taylor a TRUE Redskin#21# <--Hey wheres my green approval rating? |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,351
|
Re: Are the recievers getting open
In order for us to become a good offensive team we are going to have to get the ball in our playmakers hands. We have great WR's. Let's not overthink this. JC is young and is learning but is having a hard time getting the ball out to the WR's consistently. We have turned the corner in regards to running the ball now we've got to improve in the explosive play of our WR's.
IMO, it's not that their not open. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,540
|
Re: Are the recievers getting open
Before we blame the recievers, let's remember that JC is developing on the job. I recall reading that he still throws too late on many routes, waits for recievers to get open & then throws, rather than throwing in their break they way the play is designed. Sometimes recievers are only open for a short window before the play breaks down. That said, our wr's don't seem to do a good job of coming back to the ball when the route is over. I would've expected ARE to get more short passes coming back for the ball.
Unless Loyd shows great improvement next year, I don't see him as being a dependable wr. He'll make a big catch now & then, but doesn't seem to be in tune w/the O most of the time. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: chesapeake, va
Age: 62
Posts: 15,817
|
Re: Are the recievers getting open
Their size is not the problem its the fact that the coaches pulled Brunell just when he was starting to hit his WR's for a QB with no experence.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: D.C. area
Posts: 179
|
Re: Are the recievers getting open
Please take a look at successful passing team receiver mix a bigger receiver is a definite need. I think that pulling Brunell was a mistake also. Some people are riding high on Campbell and knocking Brunell when Brunell was actually having a better season that Campbell is producing for us, which proves to me that beauty IS in the eye of the beholder.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: chesapeake, va
Age: 62
Posts: 15,817
|
Re: Are the recievers getting open
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: D.C. area
Posts: 179
|
Re: Are the recievers getting open
Quote:
And oh by the way Cooley is not a WR |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|