![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Hail Raiser
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,049
|
Re: Smoot for Archuletta?
Smoot isn't coming back. We let him walk for a reason, he's not a typical Gregg Williams DB.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,540
|
Re: Smoot for Archuletta?
Quote:
I disagree about him not being a GW type cb, he played very physically in 04, of course it was his contract year. He jammed recievers & played tough man coverage, & tackled fairly well that year. I think we let him go for the same reason we let Pierce go, they thought they were expendable & not worth signing for that much $. Minnesota only outbid the Skins by $1 Mil. & structured his deal so he got more in the early years. We definitely tried to re-sign him. I doubt he'll be back simply because we'll be looking to upgrade & he's not the best available. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: The Southeast
Age: 42
Posts: 2,119
|
Re: Smoot for Archuletta?
If the DBs this year are examples of a "Gregg Williams DB," we are in for a hellish few season.
__________________
Your post count, reputation score, popularity ranking, VIP tag or funny signature has no bearing on how I value you as an individual. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Yorktown, Va
Age: 57
Posts: 1,587
|
Re: Smoot for Archuletta?
We had the #3 defense with Smoot as the other DB. If he is available we should go after him. He is a vocal leader and fits in the system. He won't demand the money he did when he left. Still, I think there is to much ego on this coaching staff to allow him back.
__________________
Not everything that counts can be counted, and not everything that can be counted counts. A. Einstien |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: The ATX (formerly Balmer)
Posts: 1,125
|
Re: Smoot for Archuletta?
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|