Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Tom "Iceman" Brady

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-18-2007, 12:19 PM   #1
wilsowilso
Registered User
 
wilsowilso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Age: 52
Posts: 2,841
Re: Tom "Iceman" Brady

Peyton Manning's career playoff record is 5-6! Pretty mediocre for pressure situations especially seeing as how two of those five wins are from this year when he has been god awful!
wilsowilso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2007, 05:10 PM   #2
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
Re: Tom "Iceman" Brady

Quote:
Originally Posted by wilsowilso View Post
Peyton Manning's career playoff record is 5-6! Pretty mediocre for pressure situations especially seeing as how two of those five wins are from this year when he has been god awful!
Yeah, thats worse than I would expect from Manning, but what happens during the game is more significant in predicting future games than what the outcome was. So he lost six game...why should I think he'll ever lose again?

(Even though that last question is rhetorical, I still want you to answer it. If you can, that means we are at least on the same page.)
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2007, 05:22 PM   #3
wilsowilso
Registered User
 
wilsowilso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Age: 52
Posts: 2,841
Re: Tom "Iceman" Brady

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
Yeah, thats worse than I would expect from Manning, but what happens during the game is more significant in predicting future games than what the outcome was. So he lost six game...why should I think he'll ever lose again?

(Even though that last question is rhetorical, I still want you to answer it. If you can, that means we are at least on the same page.)
I'm sure I have no idea what in the world you are rambling on about. Can you please translate this post for me? I guess this means we are not on the same page.
wilsowilso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2007, 06:59 PM   #4
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
Re: Tom "Iceman" Brady

Quote:
Originally Posted by wilsowilso View Post
I'm sure I have no idea what in the world you are rambling on about. Can you please translate this post for me? I guess this means we are not on the same page.
His record is 5-6. Fact. Does this mean he will win every playoff game the rest of his career? Does this mean that he will lose every playoff game the rest of his career? Basically, just tell me why his record of 5-6 in the playoff has significance to you.

If you are comparing it to Brady's 12-1 record, again we are getting into team statistics which have very little bearing on how good an individual is.

If you are trying to prove a different point with 5-6, please explain to me one more time what that point is.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2007, 07:11 PM   #5
wilsowilso
Registered User
 
wilsowilso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Age: 52
Posts: 2,841
Re: Tom "Iceman" Brady

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
His record is 5-6. Fact. Does this mean he will win every playoff game the rest of his career? Does this mean that he will lose every playoff game the rest of his career? Basically, just tell me why his record of 5-6 in the playoff has significance to you.

If you are comparing it to Brady's 12-1 record, again we are getting into team statistics which have very little bearing on how good an individual is.

If you are trying to prove a different point with 5-6, please explain to me one more time what that point is.
You're... you're crazy man. I like you, but you're crazy... "Frank the Tank"
wilsowilso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2007, 07:16 PM   #6
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
Re: Tom "Iceman" Brady

Quote:
Originally Posted by wilsowilso View Post
You're... you're crazy man. I like you, but you're crazy... "Frank the Tank"
I am crazy! Crazy about football!

Cool by me if you want to end this...but I thought for sure for as strong as your Brady>Manning opinion is, you'd have some interesting insight to back it up.

Guess not. Just a wing and a prayer.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2007, 07:29 PM   #7
wilsowilso
Registered User
 
wilsowilso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Age: 52
Posts: 2,841
Re: Tom "Iceman" Brady

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
I am crazy! Crazy about football!

Cool by me if you want to end this...but I thought for sure for as strong as your Brady>Manning opinion is, you'd have some interesting insight to back it up.

Guess not. Just a wing and a prayer.
Let's see I started this thread so I figure I've backed up my opinion plenty. The problem is you are "trying to end this" as you say with garbage arguments, nonsensical gibberish, absurd reasoning and plenty of smoke and mirrors. Let me ask you three questions? Do you always laugh at your own jokes? Were you on the high school jv debate team? Do you smoke Crank, Crack and or Ice? Obviously we can go on and on, but I promise you one of us will never budge in their argument and it's not me. Why don't we talk on Sunday night? It's a real big game in this debate. One more question. Is your last name Manning?
wilsowilso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2007, 06:46 PM   #8
GiantsSuck703
Registered User
 
GiantsSuck703's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 293
Re: Tom "Iceman" Brady

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
His record is 5-6. Fact. Does this mean he will win every playoff game the rest of his career? Does this mean that he will lose every playoff game the rest of his career? Basically, just tell me why his record of 5-6 in the playoff has significance to you.

If you are comparing it to Brady's 12-1 record, again we are getting into team statistics which have very little bearing on how good an individual is.

If you are trying to prove a different point with 5-6, please explain to me one more time what that point is.
I dont get your argument, your basically saying that no matter how many clutch games Tom Brady has won that in your mind its discredited because his defense helped him win those games, although you then say that its Peyton Mannings defense, not his awful play in big games that has kept him from winning superbowls. Which to me, means your using your extremely obvious bias towards Peyton as your excuse for him being the better player. Your wrong, this isnt a matter of opinion, your just flat out wrong, Tom Brady has won the meaningless games and hes won the important games, hes a gamer and a former sixth round pick who had all the odds against him when he came into the league and basically took it over, hes not the most physically gifted QB, but hes a great leader and will carve up defenses like its nothing, i have seen nothing from Peyton Manning that makes me believe hes better than the 3-time superbowl champion Tom Brady.
GiantsSuck703 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2007, 08:09 PM   #9
The Huddle
Camp Scrub
 
The Huddle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Arrington, Va.
Posts: 99
Re: Tom "Iceman" Brady

Quote:
Originally Posted by GiantsSuck703 View Post
I dont get your argument, your basically saying that no matter how many clutch games Tom Brady has won that in your mind its discredited because his defense helped him win those games, although you then say that its Peyton Mannings defense, not his awful play in big games that has kept him from winning superbowls. Which to me, means your using your extremely obvious bias towards Peyton as your excuse for him being the better player. Your wrong, this isnt a matter of opinion, your just flat out wrong, Tom Brady has won the meaningless games and hes won the important games, hes a gamer and a former sixth round pick who had all the odds against him when he came into the league and basically took it over, hes not the most physically gifted QB, but hes a great leader and will carve up defenses like its nothing, i have seen nothing from Peyton Manning that makes me believe hes better than the 3-time superbowl champion Tom Brady.
Exactly. The tired anti-Brady arguement boils down to:

Brady is good because of his team.
Manning is good in spite of his team.

Apparently Manning's stats were achieved without the benifit of an extremely talented offense designed to maximize his signature strength (his arm strength). It's all about Manning.

Meanwhile, the fact that the Pats are 12-1 in the playoffs with Brady says nothing about Brady.

Given a choice I guarantee you 2/3rds of the GMs in the NFL would take Brady over Manning if the goal was "winning a championship" and not "putting up gaudy stats".
The Huddle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2007, 09:16 PM   #10
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
Re: Tom "Iceman" Brady

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Huddle View Post
Exactly. The tired anti-Brady arguement boils down to:

Brady is good because of his team.
Manning is good in spite of his team.

Apparently Manning's stats were achieved without the benifit of an extremely talented offense designed to maximize his signature strength (his arm strength). It's all about Manning.

Meanwhile, the fact that the Pats are 12-1 in the playoffs with Brady says nothing about Brady.
See, the arguement that Manning's offensive mates are a reason why his stats look so much better than Brady's is a completely valid argument, but no one has put foward much of an arguement along those lines for me to respond to yet. Nobody has looked at Manning's numbers vs. Brady's numbers and shown me that they are at least comprable (I believe while Brady has very solid numbers, Manning is just on a different level). If someone had done that this arguement wouldn't be so silly right now. The statement, "Manning's offense is better" is a blanket statement. That doesn't mean that Brady is automatically better. Brady has a better offense than Aaron Brooks, and surely Brooks isn't better, but by your logic he would be. Use stats, or other evidence to make a case.

"Meanwhile, the fact that the Pats are 12-1 in the playoffs with Brady says nothing about Brady." Exactly. You might be learning. It certainly doesn't hurt him, but that says nothing about Tom Brady's role in those 13 games. Actually, Brady's played pretty well in most of those games, but none of you have brought that up yet. You've just thrown the record figure out there with no subsequent arguement.

It's not really about Manning's team and Brady's team at all. You've made it that way. Here's how I would state my view.

Tom Brady is a very good NFL QB.
Manning is the best Quarterback on the planet.

Quote:
Given a choice I guarantee you 2/3rds of the GMs in the NFL would take Brady over Manning if the goal was "winning a championship" and not "putting up gaudy stats".
And those 2/3 are the Matt Millen's of the world who will be out of a job in 5 years. Because if they can't see something as obvious as Manning>Brady (all hard evidence points this way), how can they be expected to select the best talent at OTHER positions where the evidence is less clear?
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2007, 09:44 PM   #11
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
Re: Tom "Iceman" Brady

Quote:
Originally Posted by GiantsSuck703 View Post
I dont get your argument, your basically saying that no matter how many clutch games Tom Brady has won that in your mind its discredited because his defense helped him win those games, although you then say that its Peyton Mannings defense, not his awful play in big games that has kept him from winning superbowls. Which to me, means your using your extremely obvious bias towards Peyton as your excuse for him being the better player. Your wrong, this isnt a matter of opinion, your just flat out wrong, Tom Brady has won the meaningless games and hes won the important games, hes a gamer and a former sixth round pick who had all the odds against him when he came into the league and basically took it over, hes not the most physically gifted QB, but hes a great leader and will carve up defenses like its nothing, i have seen nothing from Peyton Manning that makes me believe hes better than the 3-time superbowl champion Tom Brady.
How many clutch games has Tom Brady won? What defines a clutch game? Why am I wasting my time answering a post that contains only stuff I've already responded to?

In my mind, Brady's record is discredited SOME because he has such a great team. This arguement can be easily avoided by keeping all team stats out of it. Record, rings, all of the such. Work with Brady's stats, Brady's history, Brady's resume. If you want to work with outside the box stuff like contract numbers, and even arbitrary stuff like pro bowl apperences (as bad as that is), I can work with that. Compare that to Manning. After all, is that not what we are debating? Comparing Manning's record to Brady's record is like comparing apples to oranges. Very different conditions. Leave the 52 other members of the Pats out of this, and we can move on.

If you want to call him clutch, I'll live, but first:

1) define what makes it a clutch game. How much time is left, how many points are they down, etc...

2) actually show me how this makes him better than Manning.

Quote:
i have seen nothing from Peyton Manning that makes me believe hes better than the 3-time superbowl champion Tom Brady.
OK. Hows this:

Tom Brady (Career): 1896/3064 61.9% 21564 yards 7.0 yards/attempt 147 TDs 78 INTs QB Rating 88.4

Peyton Manning (Career): 3131/4890 64.0% 37586 yards 7.7 yards/attempt 275 TD 139 INT QB Rating 94.4

Clear advantage Manning.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2007, 09:53 PM   #12
wolfeskins
The Starter
 
wolfeskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: chesapeake,va.
Posts: 2,160
Re: Tom "Iceman" Brady

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
In my mind, Brady's record is discredited SOME because he has such a great team. This arguement can be easily avoided by keeping all team stats out of it. Record, rings, all of the such. .

thats just plain stupid. so are we going to throw out some of mannings completions and passing yards and adjust his completion percentage because his recievers are,greatly, better than the patriots recievers. if we keep "all" stats out of it, then how do we determine who's better ? or do you just want to throw out the stats that favor brady ?
__________________
Hail to Allen/Shanahan .... bring in some baby hogs and load up on diesel fuel !!! (budw38)
wolfeskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 1.48538 seconds with 11 queries