F... the HOF voters!!!!

[SkinEmAll]

Originally Posted by skinsfan69

I think Irvin should be there, he just shouldn't have gotten in ahead of Monk. But the voters are looking at postseason too and that's where the difference lies.

What in the world are you talking about???? Can you show me some stats that put irvin WAY ahead of Monk? Can you please explain your stance on the post season instead of leaving it open? I guess irvin made himself a household name, but it wasnt all from ON the field production. Monk should have been in by now, and the voters are watering down the value and integrity of the HOF. The HOF voting is becoming more and more like the pro bowl voting, a complete joke. I wish the voters werent replaced only when they retire or die, it should be a set number of years and then they bring in a new batch. Anyway, skinsfan69 show me what the difference is in the post season that puts irvin ahead of Monk.

[SmootSmack]

Postseason stats:

Michael Irvin: 16 games, 87 catches, 1314 yards, 8 TDs

Art Monk: 15 games, 69 catches, 1062 yards, 7 TDs

But Monk also had 6 carries for 17 yards, whereas Irvin had 0 for 0....so ha!

[SkinEmAll]

Originally Posted by TAFKAS

Postseason stats:

Michael Irvin: 16 games, 87 catches, 1314 yards, 8 TDs

Art Monk: 15 games, 69 catches, 1062 yards, 7 TDs

But Monk also had 6 carries for 17 yards, whereas Irvin had 0 for 0....so ha!

Thank you very much TAFKAS!!