![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
| View Poll Results: Would you want LaVar back with the Skins? | |||
| Yes, at any price |
|
1 | 0.85% |
| Yes, but only with a team friendly contract |
|
47 | 39.83% |
| No |
|
70 | 59.32% |
| Voters: 118. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 47
Posts: 8,317
|
Re: Giants Cut Arrington, Emmons, and Petigout
A $5M SB doesn't present much of a risk.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Hail Raiser
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,100
|
Re: Giants Cut Arrington, Emmons, and Petigout
Exactly, and a hit of $3.6M isn't really that bad.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Giants Cut Arrington, Emmons, and Petigout
I think 31 teams around the league would be wary of a $3.6 million cap hit.
This is the life we chose.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 47
Posts: 8,317
|
Re: Giants Cut Arrington, Emmons, and Petigout
I think it entirely depends on which player's contract you are talking about. In my mind, a $3.6M cap hit due to a bad gamble on player with a lot of upside isn't that much. He didn't work out, but I think a lot of people thought that Arrington had the potential to be a major force. Arrington didn't work out and the Giants lost their bet, but $3.6M isn't a lot relative to his potential.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Hail Raiser
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,100
|
Re: Giants Cut Arrington, Emmons, and Petigout
Quote:
He was a gamble for them but he also didn't break their bank either. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|