Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012
Do you honestly think we drafted him because it was in the best interest of the 2004 Redskins?
It's that kind of logic that put us where we are now.
It doesn't mean the No. 6 pick shouldn't start for us, it means that whether or not he starts as a rookie should not be among the factors considered when making the pick.
|
At # 6 there is going to be an impact player that will start for the Redskins in 2007. What are you talking about??
Would you like us to draft a running back in case Portis or Betts goes down or gets traded? That would benefit the Redskins longterm based on your theory.
Bottom line, we draft the best available player for the most pressing NEED. We're lucky to have # 6 that will be a STUD player. Don't trade away that opportunity.....top 10 defensive draft picks are as close to sure things pending health problems.