Have We Seen The Last of Archuleta in a Skins Uniform?

[GTripp0012]

Originally Posted by Redskins_P

So does that mean that we signed this guy before making sure he was 100% healthy? If we gave him that contract without knowing if he was healthy or not would make our FO look bad (Not like it hasn't already).

I hope its simply because he doesn't fit the scheme.

Schemes can help hide weaknesses and promote strengths, but it wont turn a top 10 safety into a worthless player. An injury can.

Many league figures believe that Arch was banged up pretty bad at the conclusion of 2005, so I'm guessing our medical staff ran a physical on him, but didn't find what was so wrong with his back that it hurt his ability to run and tackle.

The Fins made a similar mistake with Culpepper, but the differerence was that they didn't invest the house into that one.