![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 240
|
Re: Archuleta traded to Bears for 6th round pick
PP is a nice guy who cant start at safety in the NFL....please dont argue this point because hes spent 9 years in the league and never started plus he tore his acl last year meaning he wont be 100 percent until a year for now, its a two year injury....ARCH is gone and his money with him (we hope). SO NOW WE DRAFT LANDRY WITH 6 OR 8 which ever we have come draft day.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Archuleta traded to Bears for 6th round pick
Quote:
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
You did WHAT?!?
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: In The Kitchen With Dyna.
Age: 37
Posts: 14,189
|
Re: Archuleta traded to Bears for 6th round pick
Quote:
true and with the re-signing of stoudmire do we go after landry or do we still go after a stud d lineman i am caught between two worlds
__________________
https://open.spotify.com/artist/1NG9zNxqMP8cYNP72QqUQT Shameless self-promotion. It is what it is. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Archuleta traded to Bears for 6th round pick
No man named Landry should ever wear a Redskins uniform (RIP Tom)
Seriously though, we need help on the line. Landry will not make us a better team
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: sparta, new jersey [ northern jersey ]
Age: 62
Posts: 3,097
|
Re: Archuleta traded to Bears for 6th round pick
Quote:
I think other than C. Johnson he may be the best player in the top 10 If you put 2 players at the safety position who both can run sub 4.4 that will help our CB's immensly, the ground both Taylor and Landry could cover as Safeties may be unpressidented in football history, when's the last time a team put 2 safeties on the field with that kind of speed? The guy could probably fill in at CB if need be with 4.34 speed. Safety may not be our biggest need, but given this kid's talent it just may be the right pick, I am not sold on the D-linemen out there, and we have a fair chance of trading down a couple of spots and picking up a 2nd rounder as well. This kid is a better safety than any of these linemen are at thier perspective positions. I would hope to trade down and grab Landry, then see if we can come away with one of 3 different players, either Jarvis Moss who I think in a couple of years after having added some bulk to his frame might be the best of the pass rushers, [he reminds me a little of Charles haley] Justin Blalock, or Ben Grubbs at the O-guard position. I think we need to draft for talent rather than need right now, I don't want to get wrapped up into drafting a lineman who is just an average NFL lineman, I see to many weakness in these lineman, there really isn't a total package amoungst them. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Archuleta traded to Bears for 6th round pick
Quote:
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: sparta, new jersey [ northern jersey ]
Age: 62
Posts: 3,097
|
Re: Archuleta traded to Bears for 6th round pick
Quote:
See your problem is like many you seem to be stuck on the fact that you have to draft a lineman because of need regardless if he has NFL ability to be a big difference maker. So I guess we draft Adams and field 2 undersized D-lineman who will get man handled at the line of scrimmage, instead of just Carter being thrown around by TE's. Funny here we are addressing a pass rusher again this year, but correct me if I am wrong wasn't this addressed last off season? And there you have it signing or drafting players out of need rather than actual ability can become very repetitive, and expensive. In other words we may winde up with an average NFL lineman who's production wouldn't be much different than most other NFL lineman, rather than a real stud to pair with Taylor. And yes we should be able to trade down a bit recoupe some picks or pick and still get him. And correct me if I am wrong again at last glance we do have a big need at safety, enough so that last season we handed out the biggest contract ever for a safety to pair with Taylor, now that AA is gone and we are back to square one I am to believe that the safety position is no longer that important? And if we are able to trade down and get both Landry and a #2 that should allow us to either make a move or sit tight and grab either Moss, Blalock, or Grubbs, filling 2 needs instead of 1. Give that scenerio every time! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
MVP
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 47
Posts: 10,164
|
Re: Archuleta traded to Bears for 6th round pick
Quote:
edit: I swear smootsmack and I are different people. Even though we made the same post at the same time. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fairfax, VA
Age: 50
Posts: 4,261
|
Re: Archuleta traded to Bears for 6th round pick
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|