Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


What is your main gripe with the proposed Briggs deal?

Locker Room Main Forum


View Poll Results: What is your main gripe with the proposed Briggs deal?
Lose out on chance to take one of the top players at #6 37 27.21%
Lose out on chance to trade down for more picks 63 46.32%
Briggs doesn't fill a crucial need 83 61.03%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 136. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 03-30-2007, 12:43 PM   #11
#56fanatic
The Starter
 
#56fanatic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Charlotte NC
Age: 52
Posts: 1,801
Re: What is your main gripe with the proposed Briggs deal?

Quote:
Originally Posted by 12thMan View Post
I think it's purely debatable whether Birggs is actually a major upgrade or not. First off, you can't just isolate his past performance in a vacuum. He was one player on one of the top two or three defenses in the NFL.

Secondly, he has to learn a new system here, and how many times do we have to see a guy excel in one place only to flop somewhere else. Until Briggs comes here and absolutely shows out on the field, I will not be convinced that he's any significant upgrade. I'm done with all of these paper upgrades.
good point, but all the players we have on D have had to learn this system. only Arch apparently couldn't learn it.
#56fanatic is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.98814 seconds with 12 queries