Let's Discuss the 2007 Schedule

[GTripp0012]

Originally Posted by skinsfan69

Nobody said getting big plays was easy casue it's not. But like I said, why would our offense, with new wr's that can all run, lead the league in sideline passes the 1st 9 weeks? Sorry but that's on the Qb, and for that matter the coaching staff too. Even Madden and Aikmen pointed out our problems at QB. Sorry but I think Troy Aikman and John Madden know more about NFL quarterbacking than you or I.

I would justify the 51% to alot of things.

1. Playing in 6 different offenses in 6 years.
2. A lack of work with the 1st team wr's for the first 1 1/2 years.
3. No real game experience since 2004.
4. Needs to work on his mechanics
5. He's a young QB.

Do you know that we led the league in sideline passes, or are you just speculating that we did? Either way, is that a good or bad thing? What is it's significance?

Look, Madden and Aikman are probably the elite of their class (of color analysists), but both probably don't get to watch the Redskins play more than once or twice a year. We, as fans of the team, should be far more knowledgable about our own players because we follow the team religiously. I wouldn't put too much stock into the opinion of a member of the television media, even if that person happens to be one of the better analysts. It's pretty outlandish for anyone to make a statement concerning the effectiveness of a single player who they do not get to see often without at least consulting statistics to see if their claim can ever remotely be justified. Having a big name doesn't excuse idiocy.

As far as those 5 reasons you gave, I would agree that they all contribute to Campbell's in experience and I believe that Campbell's inexperience is the problem. We all know that Campbell is not even close to his prime yet, and that we can expect a steady improvement from him until then.

I'm just saying that it doesn't take an experienced player to complete more than 51% of his passes. He was making A LOT of mistakes concerning where to go with the football, and put simply wasn't completing passes during his first 5 starts. I can assure you he would have completed more passes and moved the ball/sustained drives better had he not tried to take the most difficult route option every other play, and setting himself up for failure.

In the last two games, he seemed to stop forcing the ball downfield, took what the defense gave him, and improved his completion % considerably. It certainly isn't his fault that we didn't win those games.

[skinsfan69]

Originally Posted by GTripp0012

Do you know that we led the league in sideline passes, or are you just speculating that we did? Either way, is that a good or bad thing? What is it's significance?

Look, Madden and Aikman are probably the elite of their class (of color analysists), but both probably don't get to watch the Redskins play more than once or twice a year. We, as fans of the team, should be far more knowledgable about our own players because we follow the team religiously. I wouldn't put too much stock into the opinion of a member of the television media, even if that person happens to be one of the better analysts. It's pretty outlandish for anyone to make a statement concerning the effectiveness of a single player who they do not get to see often without at least consulting statistics to see if their claim can ever remotely be justified. Having a big name doesn't excuse idiocy.

As far as those 5 reasons you gave, I would agree that they all contribute to Campbell's in experience and I believe that Campbell's inexperience is the problem. We all know that Campbell is not even close to his prime yet, and that we can expect a steady improvement from him until then.

I'm just saying that it doesn't take an experienced player to complete more than 51% of his passes. He was making A LOT of mistakes concerning where to go with the football, and put simply wasn't completing passes during his first 5 starts. I can assure you he would have completed more passes and moved the ball/sustained drives better had he not tried to take the most difficult route option every other play, and setting himself up for failure.

In the last two games, he seemed to stop forcing the ball downfield, took what the defense gave him, and improved his completion % considerably. It certainly isn't his fault that we didn't win those games.

I would say it's a bad thing in our situation. I believe Madden or Aikman pointed this stat out during one of the games that we were really struggling in the passing game. Aikman did a few of our games so that means they break down film on us and so forth. And I remember Aikman making several comments about our offense needing to back the defense off of the line of scrimmage.

Remember that Elway had a real low % his first year starting. Manning threw 28 ints his first year starting. If he were completing 51% after the end of next year then you would have an argument. But nothing in his past suggests that this will continue. He was always above or around 60% in college.

I personally hope Brunell's shoulder heals and he comes back. He will be more comfortable in Al's offense. But I would let Collins compete for the back-up job.

[GTripp0012]

Originally Posted by skinsfan69

I would say it's a bad thing in our situation. I believe Madden or Aikman pointed this stat out during one of the games that we were really struggling in the passing game. Aikman did a few of our games so that means they break down film on us and so forth. And I remember Aikman making several comments about our offense needing to back the defense off of the line of scrimmage.

Remember that Elway had a real low % his first year starting. Manning threw 28 ints his first year starting. If he were completing 51% after the end of next year then you would have an argument. But nothing in his past suggests that this will continue. He was always above or around 60% in college.

I personally hope Brunell's shoulder heals and he comes back. He will be more comfortable in Al's offense. But I would let Collins compete for the back-up job.

Elway actually has a really low career completion %. I mean, looking at that one stat out of context, it would seem silly to debate HOF credentials for Elway.

But John Elway did play in an era when QB friendly offenses pretty much only existed by way of the run n shoot, and the Bill Walsh west coast. I actually think the system that Elway was in (with Dan Reeves) for the 12 years of his career was one of the most QB unfriendly systems ever. A lot of vertical, not necessarily drive sustaining, but because of Elway, the system was successful.

But for a ROOKIE QB, a low completion % is acceptable. Very rarely is a rookie QB ever good enough to play much above replacement level. Matt Leinart was one exception, and Peyton Manning was another...but even they struggled mightily compared to what weve come to expect from them.

But that's the thing about Campbell--he wasn't a rookie. He had been practicing with NFL caliber talent every week for the last year and a half. The adjustment period between practice and a game was inevitable, but the propensity to force the ball downfield just seemed a bit perplexing. It's not like this was an issue with Campbell in college. He had a very good completion % in college. It just manifested itself for 5 games, and then disapeared for the last two. Weird.

Because of what he did in college, and the fact that he's now a 3rd year pro with 7 starts under his belt, we should see a numbers spike in Campbell. If we see no improvement this year, I'd be very worried about the accuracy of his projection. 7 games is a relatively small sample to judge a player, but because of the hype surrounding this kid in sabremetric circles, I guess I just expected to see smarter decision making right off the bat.

51% is still inexcusable for any non-rookie QB, and Campbell wasn't a rookie last year. Raw, yes. A rookie fresh out of college? Not at all.

[skinsfan69]

Originally Posted by GTripp0012

Elway actually has a really low career completion %. I mean, looking at that one stat out of context, it would seem silly to debate HOF credentials for Elway.

But John Elway did play in an era when QB friendly offenses pretty much only existed by way of the run n shoot, and the Bill Walsh west coast. I actually think the system that Elway was in (with Dan Reeves) for the 12 years of his career was one of the most QB unfriendly systems ever. A lot of vertical, not necessarily drive sustaining, but because of Elway, the system was successful.

But for a ROOKIE QB, a low completion % is acceptable. Very rarely is a rookie QB ever good enough to play much above replacement level. Matt Leinart was one exception, and Peyton Manning was another...but even they struggled mightily compared to what weve come to expect from them.

But that's the thing about Campbell--he wasn't a rookie. He had been practicing with NFL caliber talent every week for the last year and a half. The adjustment period between practice and a game was inevitable, but the propensity to force the ball downfield just seemed a bit perplexing. It's not like this was an issue with Campbell in college. He had a very good completion % in college. It just manifested itself for 5 games, and then disapeared for the last two. Weird.

Because of what he did in college, and the fact that he's now a 3rd year pro with 7 starts under his belt, we should see a numbers spike in Campbell. If we see no improvement this year, I'd be very worried about the accuracy of his projection. 7 games is a relatively small sample to judge a player, but because of the hype surrounding this kid in sabremetric circles, I guess I just expected to see smarter decision making right off the bat.

51% is still inexcusable for any non-rookie QB, and Campbell wasn't a rookie last year. Raw, yes. A rookie fresh out of college? Not at all.

51% is not inexcusable at all. The coaches were all happy with his performace and that's more important than what picky fans think. They see this guy up close everyday and they know how good he can be. Remember his first year he didn't do anything but watch. He didn't even run the scout team. He was the 3rd qb. Year two he ran the scout team. Either way he DID NOT get any reps w/ Moss, Cooley, Lloyd and ARE. No game experience and had to learn yet another offense. What Qb would come in and complete 60% and have a high rating in this situation? Not many if any. I think if you would stop just looking at completion % and rating you would see some of the good things the guy did. What were we suppose to do? Leave in Brunell? C'mon.

[GTripp0012]

Originally Posted by skinsfan69

51% is not inexcusable at all. The coaches were all happy with his performace and that's more important than what picky fans think. They see this guy up close everyday and they know how good he can be. Remember his first year he didn't do anything but watch. He didn't even run the scout team. He was the 3rd qb. Year two he ran the scout team. Either way he DID NOT get any reps w/ Moss, Cooley, Lloyd and ARE. No game experience and had to learn yet another offense. What Qb would come in and complete 60% and have a high rating in this situation? Not many if any. I think if you would stop just looking at completion % and rating you would see some of the good things the guy did. What were we suppose to do? Leave in Brunell? C'mon.

The coaches did the right thing...even if they cost us a few wins, that pales in comparision to the value of getting the young guy out on the field in a lost season. Once the season became lost, it was really a no brainer.

I was not expecting him to come in and set the world on fire. I was just hoping to see more than just a small glimpse of what he is capable of. I was hoping to see Campbell put up Brunell like numbers, something I know he is capable of. I was frusterated when he was forcing the ball, something that is totally uncharacteristic of a great QB no matter how far along he is in his development.

[KLHJ2]

Originally Posted by GTripp0012

The coaches did the right thing...even if they cost us a few wins, that pales in comparision to the value of getting the young guy out on the field in a lost season. Once the season became lost, it was really a no brainer.

I was not expecting him to come in and set the world on fire. I was just hoping to see more than just a small glimpse of what he is capable of. I was hoping to see Campbell put up Brunell like numbers, something I know he is capable of. I was frusterated when he was forcing the ball, something that is totally uncharacteristic of a great QB no matter how far along he is in his development.

While I agree that he forced too many, I have to disagree that great QB's don't. Case and point Bret Favre.

[GTripp0012]

Originally Posted by angryssg

While I agree that he forced too many, I have to disagree that great QB's don't. Case and point Bret Favre.

Farve does force a lot of balls, but that's something he never outgrew despite his greatness. It wasn't a developmental thing, just a flaw in his otherwise flawless game.