![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
| View Poll Results: Your opinion on the selection of Landry? | |||
| Love it |
|
106 | 59.55% |
| Hate it |
|
12 | 6.74% |
| On the fence |
|
60 | 33.71% |
| Voters: 178. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Age: 52
Posts: 5,311
|
Re: It's LaRon Landry!
The thing that's always bothered me about Williams' system is the almost total reliance on the secondary and linebackers for the pass rush. I know it all seemed to work fine in 2004, and to a lesser extent in '05.
The problem is that if your secondary isn't as talented or suffers from significant injuries, your pass rush goes to hell if the defensive line can't pick up the slack. That's why I continue to say that no matter the sophistication of a particular defense, you still have to be at least better than average along the front four. Until they make some upgrades, even with Landry and Fletcher I think we could be in trouble. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Dec 2006
Age: 47
Posts: 271
|
Re: It's LaRon Landry!
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Hail Raiser
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,115
|
Re: It's LaRon Landry!
It worked in his time with the Titans and Bills as well, and the roots of his scheme goes back to Buddy Ryan and the 46 which brought pressure from all over the field too. It may not be conventional, but it's also not a fad type of system either.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Age: 52
Posts: 5,311
|
Re: It's LaRon Landry!
Quote:
You still have to have a decent front four. I know the coaches think everything is hunky-dorey with our guys, but we'll know for sure by August. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|