|
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
05-11-2007, 10:32 AM
|
#1 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,657
|
Re: Franchise Tag: Cooley or Taylor?
I wouldn't franchise either guy. I would sign Cooley to a long term deal. He deserves it. Taylor? I don't know about him. Is it me, or does it seem like he just doesn't want to be here??
|
|
|
|
05-11-2007, 12:28 PM
|
#2 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Germantown, Md.
Posts: 4,832
|
Re: Franchise Tag: Cooley or Taylor?
Franchise Tag usually means one thing "distraction" something the Redskins are no stranger too.
__________________
A revolution is coming and it will be televised. |
|
|
|
|
05-11-2007, 04:13 PM
|
#3 |
|
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 33
|
Re: Franchise Tag: Cooley or Taylor?
Taylor is locked in for a few more years but Cooley should be a priority in getting signed like now. Now is the best time to do it. His value should be affordable and we can get him into a cap friendly contract. Once we are into the start of the season its too late, he's going to test the market and if he has a good year no way we sign him. The SKINs track record in resigning their own marquee FAs is bad. Ladell Betts has been their only success. Everyone else left: Smoot (although he's back and cheaper), Pierce, Clark, Dockery
|
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
