Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Redskins_P presents Best Training Camp Battle

Locker Room Main Forum


View Poll Results: Fiercest Camp Battle
LeMar vs. Rocky 55 33.54%
Smoot vs. Rogers 63 38.41%
Landry vs. Prioleau, Fox, Stoutmire, etc. 26 15.85%
Brunell vs. Collins 1 0.61%
Lloyd vs. Randle El 13 7.93%
Other (explain) 6 3.66%
Voters: 164. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 05-26-2007, 11:27 PM   #10
Aussie_Skins_Fan
Camp Scrub
 
Aussie_Skins_Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 61
Re: Redskins_P presents Best Training Camp Battle

Quote:
Originally Posted by firstdown View Post
I voted other. We all know how much Gibbs loves Brunell and if JC is not ready Brunell could win his job back. Brunell holds the edge because of his time in Saunders system and time on the field with our WR's.
No way!!!!!!

Even if Gibbs doesn't think JC is ready, it's already too late...He started him last year, now if he drops him after an eintire off season to prepare, JC's confidence would be shattered and i would doubt he'd ever start for us after that!

And haven't JC and Brunell been in Saunders system for the same amount of time?!

(BTW if this post was a joke, it just isn't funny!)
__________________
Even from the other side of the world, i still HAIL!
Aussie_Skins_Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:52 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.71095 seconds with 12 queries