Is Cooley Still Considered an H-Back?

[mmil12]

Last year sellers played H-Back. He participated in the passing game as well as lead blocking. The true essence of an H-Back.

[MTK]

Originally Posted by mmil12

Last year sellers played H-Back. He participated in the passing game as well as lead blocking. The true essence of an H-Back.

A FB can also be involved with the passing game.

Saunders' offense doesn't use a true H-Back.

[JDALY27]

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

A FB can also be involved with the passing game.

Saunders' offense doesn't use a true H-Back.

Sellers is the Fullback and Cooley is the H-Back.

Under Gibbs before Al Cooley was more of a TE than ever. He used to line up at the line of scrimmage much more often.

Under Al Cooley is split out flexed more and seems to me that its just what an H-back is. Not a Fullback, Not a TE, Not a receiver.....H-BACK!!!

Sorry AL, you use an H-BACK!!

[MTK]

Originally Posted by JDALY27

Sellers is the Fullback and Cooley is the H-Back.

Under Gibbs before Al Cooley was more of a TE than ever. He used to line up at the line of scrimmage much more often.

Under Al Cooley is split out flexed more and seems to me that its just what an H-back is. Not a Fullback, Not a TE, Not a receiver.....H-BACK!!!

Sorry AL, you use an H-BACK!!

I guess that will be news to Saunders.

[skinsfan_nn]

Originally Posted by JDALY27

Sellers is the Fullback and Cooley is the H-Back.

Under Gibbs before Al Cooley was more of a TE than ever. He used to line up at the line of scrimmage much more often.

Under Al Cooley is split out flexed more and seems to me that its just what an H-back is. Not a Fullback, Not a TE, Not a receiver.....H-BACK!!!

Sorry AL, you use an H-BACK!!

Glad you just schooled Al.......he's a TE

[JDALY27]

Originally Posted by skinsfan_nn

Glad you just schooled Al.......he's a TE

He's a Joe Gibbs H-back. That's what he was drafted for and that's what he is. AL Saunders can call him whatever he wants......

[skinsfan_nn]

Originally Posted by JDALY27

He's a Joe Gibbs H-back. That's what he was drafted for and that's what he is. AL Saunders can call him whatever he wants......

Well daly let me tell you something. I was very lucky to play golf with CC 2 weeks ago.

HIS EXACT WORDS AND I QUOTE, "THE SKINS WANT TO PAY ME LIKE AN AVERAGE TIGHT END"!

Now that's NOT Joe or Al words. THAT WAS CC EXACT WORDS!

SO IS HE STILL AN H-BACK IN YOUR MIND.....?

[JDALY27]

Originally Posted by skinsfan_nn

Well daly let me tell you something. I was very lucky to play golf with CC 2 weeks ago.

HIS EXACT WORDS AND I QUOTE, "THE SKINS WANT TO PAY ME LIKE AN AVERAGE TIGHT END"!

Now that's NOT Joe or Al words. THAT WAS CC EXACT WORDS!

SO IS HE STILL AN H-BACK IN YOUR MIND.....?

John Daly's response: Yes

Just b/c the skins want to pay him like an average TE, does that have to make him one? What other points of reference would they have to go off of if they wanted to pay him like an H-back?

[skinsfan_nn]

Originally Posted by JDALY27

Sellers is the Fullback and Cooley is the H-Back.

Under Gibbs before Al Cooley was more of a TE than ever. He used to line up at the line of scrimmage much more often.

Under Al Cooley is split out flexed more and seems to me that its just what an H-back is. Not a Fullback, Not a TE, Not a receiver.....H-BACK!!!

Sorry AL, you use an H-BACK!!

JDALY, good luck on the golfing next week.....? This might help clear it up for you....?

For Cooley, A Focused Offseason

[Tha Posse]

So what would be the difference in cost for a franchised TE and a franchised H-Back. Would they just go by the average of the top TE's in the league or H-Backs? Kind of a loop hole if it would work, there aren't many H-Backs(on paper) in the NFL. Regardless I pray it wouldn't come to us franchising Cooley!

[EARTHQUAKE2689]

Originally Posted by Tha Posse

So what would be the difference in cost for a franchised TE and a franchised H-Back. Would they just go by the average of the top TE's in the league or H-Backs? Kind of a loop hole if it would work, there aren't many H-Backs(on paper) in the NFL. Regardless I pray it wouldn't come to us franchising Cooley!

a H-back would be franchised under a fullback status

[WarriorSpirit]

Originally Posted by Tha Posse

So what would be the difference in cost for a franchised TE and a franchised H-Back. Would they just go by the average of the top TE's in the league or H-Backs? Kind of a loop hole if it would work, there aren't many H-Backs(on paper) in the NFL. Regardless I pray it wouldn't come to us franchising Cooley!

There is no designation for FB or H-Back. Both would fall under RB, which would be a huge difference in the franchise tag number from the TE position.
Regardless, it doesn't matter, Cooley is a TE now under Saunders system.

[EARTHQUAKE2689]

Originally Posted by WarriorSpirit

There is no designation for FB or H-Back. Both would fall under RB, which would be a huge difference in the franchise tag number from the TE position.
Regardless, it doesn't matter, Cooley is a TE now under Saunders system.

Where is NoVa????

[Tha Posse]

I don't dispute that he is considered a TE