|
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
| View Poll Results: Saden's Team Most Likely to Win their Division Poll | |||
| Miami |
   
|
9 | 7.89% |
| Cleveland |
  
|
3 | 2.63% |
| Houston |
  
|
1 | 0.88% |
| Oakland |
  
|
1 | 0.88% |
| Detroit |
  
|
13 | 11.40% |
| Tampa Bay |
  
|
36 | 31.58% |
| Arizona |
|
51 | 44.74% |
| Voters: 114. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
07-09-2007, 11:23 AM
|
#31 |
|
I like big (_|_)s.
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia
Age: 44
Posts: 19,264
|
Re: 2007 Worst to First?
Out of the given choices, I'm going to say the Cardinals. The offense is obviously explosive and if their defense can come together, they'll be a good team this year.
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted. |
|
|
| Advertisements |
|
07-09-2007, 11:24 AM
|
#32 | |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Lakewood, CO
Posts: 5,644
|
Re: 2007 Worst to First?
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
07-09-2007, 11:29 AM
|
#33 | |
|
Hail Raiser
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,044
|
Re: 2007 Worst to First?
Quote:
Go ball coach! Click-clack! |
|
|
|
|
|
07-09-2007, 11:42 AM
|
#34 |
|
I like big (_|_)s.
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia
Age: 44
Posts: 19,264
|
Re: 2007 Worst to First?
It's CLACKETY-clack. Don't you know anything?!
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted. |
|
|
|
|
07-09-2007, 11:46 AM
|
#35 |
|
Hail Raiser
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,044
|
Re: 2007 Worst to First?
I love Ashy Larry LOL
I'm talking about this click-clack though |
|
|
|
|
07-09-2007, 11:49 AM
|
#36 |
|
I like big (_|_)s.
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia
Age: 44
Posts: 19,264
|
Re: 2007 Worst to First?
HA. I know, that shit kills me. This is "Ball Coach". LOL
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted. |
|
|
|
|
07-09-2007, 12:12 PM
|
#37 | |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Lakewood, CO
Posts: 5,644
|
Re: 2007 Worst to First?
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
07-10-2007, 10:06 AM
|
#38 |
|
Hail Raiser
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,044
|
Re: 2007 Worst to First?
I went with Houston just to get them on the board.
I honestly don't see any of these teams rising up and winning their divisions. |
|
|
|
|
07-18-2007, 10:11 AM
|
#39 |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: St. Louis, MO
Age: 70
Posts: 868
|
Re: 2007 Worst to First?
I only picked Arizona because they play in a sorry division and the "NONE OF THE ABOVE" option wasn't available.
__________________
"HAIL TO THE SKINS" |
|
|
|
|
07-18-2007, 02:32 PM
|
#40 |
|
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Virginia Beach
Age: 48
Posts: 16
|
Re: 2007 Worst to First?
Arizona is the sexy pick again... but I think Seattle and St Loius and even San Fran will disturb any run at the division the try to make...
Tampa Bay could make a come back after the bad year they had last year...
__________________
Have Faith & Believe - HAIL! |
|
|
|
|
07-18-2007, 02:38 PM
|
#41 |
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ellicott City, MD
Age: 43
Posts: 8,029
|
Re: 2007 Worst to First?
I went with the lions because I think that the NFC North will be such a crappy division this year that anyone could take it. That said, I really hope/think we'll sweep them this season..
__________________
"Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man." The Dude |
|
|
|
|
07-18-2007, 02:49 PM
|
#42 | |
|
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Virginia Beach
Age: 48
Posts: 16
|
Re: 2007 Worst to First?
Quote:
I do think we should be able to beat the entire division as well. I don't think Chicago is that great (good - yes, but not great) other than their Defense.... I guess we shall see.
__________________
Have Faith & Believe - HAIL! |
|
|
|
|
|
07-19-2007, 02:53 PM
|
#43 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 542
|
Re: 2007 Worst to First?
i vote none of the above!
|
|
|
|
|
07-19-2007, 04:49 PM
|
#44 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Rehoboth Beach, DE
Posts: 3,494
|
Re: 2007 Worst to First?
Detroit. Just ask them.
__________________
There's nowhere to go but up. Or down. I guess we could stay where we are, too. |
|
|
|
|
07-20-2007, 02:41 AM
|
#45 |
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 31 Spooner St.
Age: 51
Posts: 9,534
|
Re: 2007 Worst to First?
I picked Cleveland, cause they have talent. However, I do not think that...I would have chose none of the above.
I do think Detroit has a better shot than Arizona for the simple fact that the NFC Central is weak, and the bears could easily take a huge dive. An 8-8 team could win that division.
__________________
Zoltan is ZESTY! - courtesy of joeredskin |
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
