The legacy of 'W'?

[RobH4413]

Originally Posted by 12thMan

The reason I ask is because your comment on Romney is interesting, yet true.

I think, initially anyway, that we're more ready for a black or female president than a Mormon. Interesting to say the least.

Forget religion... Romney is charismatic. I see us electing for charisma before thinking about his religion or politics.

Just the nature of the beast.

[saden1]

Originally Posted by RobH4413

Forget religion... Romney is charismatic. I see us electing for charisma before thinking about his religion or politics.

Just the nature of the beast.

Romney is charismatic? I suppose it depends on how you see him. I see him as disingenuous and he kinda reminds me of John Kerry. I pay very close attention to a candidates body language and facial expressions, and I really don't like that of Romney and Hilary.

Checkout this great article on leading presidential candidates and what their body language tells us.

[RobH4413]

Originally Posted by saden1

Romney is charismatic? I suppose it depends on how you see him. I see him as disingenuous and he kinda reminds me of John Kerry. I pay very close attention to a candidates body language and facial expressions, and I really don't like that of Romney and Hilary.

Checkout this great article on leading presidential candidates and what their body language tells us.

I think he's a douche and I don't like him. I'm just going on what I hear from the general population. Your article backs me up on this one.

[RobH4413]

I'm down... I think it should be open to everyone though, with fair warning before hand that any ignorant / inappropriate comments will result in 3 month ban (literally) and deletion of your post.

Plus I think Smoot wants to lay the smack down on someone... It's been a while since It's happened. If I were a mod, I'd be playing "The Final Countdown" on permanent loop before the thread just to get ready to dish out some action.

Seriously though, I think everyone can benefit from hearing a wide range of thoughts / ideas in a semi-controlled environment. It'll be our farewell to the off season thread.

[SmootSmack]

Originally Posted by RobH4413

I'm down... I think it should be open to everyone though, with fair warning before hand that any ignorant / inappropriate comments will result in 3 month ban (literally) and deletion of your post.

Plus I think Smoot wants to lay the smack down on someone... It's been a while since It's happened. If I were a mod, I'd be playing "The Final Countdown" on permanent loop before the thread just to get ready to dish out some action.

Seriously though, I think everyone can benefit from hearing a wide range of thoughts / ideas in a semi-controlled environment. It'll be our farewell to the off season thread.

I don't know. It took a while for us to have faith that we could renew political discussion.

I'm not against the discussion, which I think should be free for all. But, we'd have to be very careful and no "You all hate Michael Vick because he's Black" posts.

Ultimately, this is Matty's call

[RobH4413]

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

I don't know. It took a while for us to have faith that we could renew political discussion.

I'm not against the discussion, which I think should be free for all. But, we'd have to be very careful and no "You all hate Michael Vick because he's Black" posts.

Ultimately, this is Matty's call

Yeah, That's why I decided not to start the thread in the first place a while back.

I actually was halfway through a PM to Matty to ask him about it when I just thought it might be too much.

I think the thread would start out very constructive, but would idle until someone went off the edge. Maybe have the thread open for 24 hours, see how it goes.

Another option would be to start it in an independent forum outside of the warpath.

[724Skinsfan]

Okay, here's a shocker: I'm a little confused. What exactly would the debate/discussion be about?