Ted Nugent on Gun Control

[saden1]

Originally Posted by Beemnseven

They also never envisioned internet porn. Should there be limits to freedom of expression and speech in light of that?

You're missing the point. What purpose do silencers, hollow point bullets, and AK-47's serve with respect to the second amendment?

[Lady Brave]

I do think the number of handguns a person can own should be limited. This of course would not apply to antiques, curios and relics. They're not subject to either the gun control act or brady act.

If you're coming into my office and getting 10 handgun purchase permits every other month, you should be forced to get some sort of collector's license.

[Beemnseven]

Originally Posted by saden1

You're missing the point. What purpose do silencers, hollow point bullets, and AK-47's serve with respect to the second amendment?

The same purpose internet porn, television and talk radio serve the first amendment. They are extensions of the rights set forth in the Constitution as it grows in modern terms to reflect the technological advance of society.

The Bill of Rights aren't negated by the growth of human ingenuity.

[saden1]

Originally Posted by Beemnseven

The same purpose internet porn, television and talk radio serve the first amendment. They are extensions of the rights set forth in the Constitution as it grows in modern terms to reflect the technological advance of society.

The Bill of Rights aren't negated by the growth of human ingenuity.

Well, the only difference is that those things are not an assassin's weapons. They don't kill. I suppose the difference between you and I is that I think the constitution is open to interpretation and common sense rules the day. We'll just have to agree to disagree.

p.s. I would like your take on people being able to browse for porn in schools and libraries.