|
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
07-17-2007, 03:13 AM
|
#1 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 331
|
Re: Scouts Inc WR rankings
Outside of Moss, I am not a fan of our wideouts. Let them prove me wrong.
|
|
|
|
07-17-2007, 07:31 AM
|
#2 | |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Age: 52
Posts: 5,311
|
Re: Scouts Inc WR rankings
Quote:
When you think about it, we haven't had so much as a solid wideout duo since '99 with Westbrook and Connell. Lloyd or Randle El have to step the hell up this year. |
|
|
|
|
|
07-17-2007, 10:15 AM
|
#3 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Roanoke, VA
Posts: 3,508
|
Re: Scouts Inc WR rankings
Quote:
Wow, thanks to this thread I now have an uneasy feeling (temporarily, I'm sure) going into the season. Here's why: WR's after Moss are question marks. Defensive line performance is a question mark. QB production is a question mark. Clinton Portis' health is a question mark. McIntosh's play is a question mark. Washington's health is a question mark (until I see otherwise). Landry at safety is a question mark. Springs health is a question mark. Smoot's on field production is a question mark. Todd Wade is a question mark. Stupid off-season giving me time to dwell on negative crap!
__________________
"I hope I'm getting better. I hope you haven't seen my best." - Jim Zorn |
|
|
|
|
|
07-17-2007, 10:46 AM
|
#4 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: 129 W 81st street
Age: 47
Posts: 3,503
|
Re: Scouts Inc WR rankings
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
07-17-2007, 01:06 PM
|
#5 | |
|
Contains football related knowledge
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Second Star On The Right
Age: 63
Posts: 10,401
|
Re: Scouts Inc WR rankings
Quote:
Now that a Scouts Inc. review I would love to see.
__________________
Strap it up, hold onto the ball, and let’s go. |
|
|
|
|
|
07-17-2007, 01:59 PM
|
#6 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Yorktown, Va
Age: 57
Posts: 1,587
|
Re: Scouts Inc WR rankings
I think that our receivers are set to have a break out year.
Here's why: 1. They are no longer learning a new system. 2. The coaches are no longer having to learn what Lloyd and El do best. 3. Lloyd is better suited to the down field throws that we can expect from Campbell more than we could with Brunell. 4. Saunders offense typically lights it up in year 2. 5. see number 4. and add that the previous offenses never needed big name receivers. 6. Chemistry
__________________
Not everything that counts can be counted, and not everything that can be counted counts. A. Einstien |
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
