Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Scouts Inc WR rankings

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-17-2007, 10:15 AM   #1
724Skinsfan
Playmaker
 
724Skinsfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Roanoke, VA
Posts: 3,508
Re: Scouts Inc WR rankings

Quote:
Originally Posted by Beemnseven View Post
Yep, I'm with you on that one.

When you think about it, we haven't had so much as a solid wideout duo since '99 with Westbrook and Connell. Lloyd or Randle El have to step the hell up this year.

Wow, thanks to this thread I now have an uneasy feeling (temporarily, I'm sure) going into the season. Here's why:

WR's after Moss are question marks.
Defensive line performance is a question mark.
QB production is a question mark.
Clinton Portis' health is a question mark.
McIntosh's play is a question mark.
Washington's health is a question mark (until I see otherwise).
Landry at safety is a question mark.
Springs health is a question mark.
Smoot's on field production is a question mark.
Todd Wade is a question mark.

Stupid off-season giving me time to dwell on negative crap!
__________________
"I hope I'm getting better. I hope you haven't seen my best." - Jim Zorn
724Skinsfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2007, 10:46 AM   #2
gibbsisgod
Playmaker
 
gibbsisgod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: 129 W 81st street
Age: 47
Posts: 3,503
Re: Scouts Inc WR rankings

Quote:
Originally Posted by 724Skinsfan View Post
Wow, thanks to this thread I now have an uneasy feeling (temporarily, I'm sure) going into the season. Here's why:

WR's after Moss are question marks.
Defensive line performance is a question mark.
QB production is a question mark.
Clinton Portis' health is a question mark.
McIntosh's play is a question mark.
Washington's health is a question mark (until I see otherwise).
Landry at safety is a question mark.
Springs health is a question mark.
Smoot's on field production is a question mark.
Todd Wade is a question mark.

Stupid off-season giving me time to dwell on negative crap!
I don't see any of these things as being question marks. All we have to do is read what all the experts write. We will be an embarassment this year. They all agree we will be horrible so maybe the skins will just forfeit all the games this year and save themselves the embarassment.
gibbsisgod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2007, 01:06 PM   #3
JoeRedskin
Contains football related knowledge
 
JoeRedskin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Second Star On The Right
Age: 63
Posts: 10,401
Re: Scouts Inc WR rankings

Quote:
Originally Posted by 724Skinsfan View Post
Wow, thanks to this thread I now have an uneasy feeling (temporarily, I'm sure) going into the season. Here's why:

WR's after Moss are question marks.
Defensive line performance is a question mark.
QB production is a question mark.
Clinton Portis' health is a question mark.
McIntosh's play is a question mark.
Washington's health is a question mark (until I see otherwise).
Landry at safety is a question mark.
Springs health is a question mark.
Smoot's on field production is a question mark.
Todd Wade is a question mark.

Stupid off-season giving me time to dwell on negative crap!
Don't worry, the Cheerleaders are still hot.

Now that a Scouts Inc. review I would love to see.
__________________
Strap it up, hold onto the ball, and let’s go.
JoeRedskin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2007, 01:59 PM   #4
GoSkins!
The Starter
 
GoSkins!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Yorktown, Va
Age: 57
Posts: 1,587
Re: Scouts Inc WR rankings

I think that our receivers are set to have a break out year.

Here's why:

1. They are no longer learning a new system.
2. The coaches are no longer having to learn what Lloyd and El do best.
3. Lloyd is better suited to the down field throws that we can expect from Campbell more than we could with Brunell.
4. Saunders offense typically lights it up in year 2.
5. see number 4. and add that the previous offenses never needed big name receivers.
6. Chemistry
__________________
Not everything that counts can be counted, and not everything that can be counted counts. A. Einstien
GoSkins! is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.50010 seconds with 11 queries