![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
| View Poll Results: Should the Redskins sign Simeon Rice? | |||
| Yes |
|
84 | 51.22% |
| No |
|
80 | 48.78% |
| Voters: 164. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 1,555
|
Re: Simeon Rice released by Bucs
A one-year deal sounds good, but I seriously doubt Rice would be interested in signing anything that didn't include a pretty decent signing bonus and if you had a one-year deal that entire charge would be forwarded to this year. Plus, JLC reported that the Skins are $7 mil under the cap before getting Landry's deal done. Apparently the max charge he could have would be $2.1 (as that is what is left under the rookie cap, but I'm not cap expert). In any case, for sake of argument say Landry's charge ends up as $2 mil. That would leave the Skins w/ $5 mil, which a one year, $4 mil deal to Rice would eat up. Then what about getting a new deal for Cooley? I just looked up the cap charges of the top paid tight ends and Shockey, Crumpler, and Winslow all have cap charges right around $4 mil (Gates is at almost $5 mil). I'd rather spend the money on Cooley as he will be the one that will help the team for many years as opposed to bringing in some injured guy to (maybe) help for one. The Skins need DL help, but not at the cost Rice will likely command.
__________________
It has taken a long time, but I have finally realized that nothing I say about the Redskins will have any effect upon anything the Redskins do. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, VA
Age: 42
Posts: 3,109
|
Re: Simeon Rice released by Bucs
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|