Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Mike Pucillo v. Todd Wade

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-18-2007, 04:28 PM   #1
70Chip
Playmaker
 
70Chip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Manassas
Age: 55
Posts: 3,048
Re: Mike Pucillo v. Todd Wade

A couple of points:

1. Dockery would not have helped much last week. He can only block HIS man. I don't think we can say based on last week that we should have broken the bank for D.D.

2. If Pucillo can play guard, then we should consider Wade at RT because he played great against New Orleans last year and this thing with Jansen has been building for some time now. He is not the player he was. That's not to say that he can't have a good year, but it won't be easy for him. He will have to actually work at it.

3. Everything we saw last week could be irrelevant. Look at the difference between the Eagles in their first two games. I have a hard time believing that our O-Line, which was dominant the second half of last year, could suddenly turn to shit because the one player that everyone here would have said was the weak link, if you had taken a poll any time last year, isn't here anymore. Stephon Heyer is a rookie and the others looked rusty. The defense is often ahead of the offense in pre-season and I expect this group to edge their way back into form. I just can't beieve that Dockery is irreplaceable even if Wade is not the answer. But I could be wrong. The Bills obviously saw something.
__________________
This Monkey's Gone to Heaven
70Chip is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2007, 04:36 PM   #2
12thMan
MVP
 
12thMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,460
Re: Mike Pucillo v. Todd Wade

Quote:
Originally Posted by 70Chip View Post
A couple of points:

1. Dockery would not have helped much last week. He can only block HIS man. I don't think we can say based on last week that we should have broken the bank for D.D.

2. If Pucillo can play guard, then we should consider Wade at RT because he played great against New Orleans last year and this thing with Jansen has been building for some time now. He is not the player he was. That's not to say that he can't have a good year, but it won't be easy for him. He will have to actually work at it.

3. Everything we saw last week could be irrelevant. Look at the difference between the Eagles in their first two games. I have a hard time believing that our O-Line, which was dominant the second half of last year, could suddenly turn to shit because the one player that everyone here would have said was the weak link, if you had taken a poll any time last year, isn't here anymore. Stephon Heyer is a rookie and the others looked rusty. The defense is often ahead of the offense in pre-season and I expect this group to edge their way back into form. I just can't beieve that Dockery is irreplaceable even if Wade is not the answer. But I could be wrong. The Bills obviously saw something.

Good points. The defense generally is ahead of the game at this point in the season; the offense is much more timing oriented.

That being said, let's look at Pucillo tonight to see how he fairs against an aggresive defense.
12thMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2007, 04:46 PM   #3
70Chip
Playmaker
 
70Chip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Manassas
Age: 55
Posts: 3,048
Re: Mike Pucillo v. Todd Wade

Quote:
Originally Posted by 12thMan View Post
Good points. The defense generally is ahead of the game at this point in the season; the offense is much more timing oriented.

That being said, let's look at Pucillo tonight to see how he fairs against an aggresive defense.
They have their work cut out again. I'd hate to have to pass block against those guys. They come from every which way. We shall see what happens. What I hate is that if they suck again it will be a full blown media thing this week. What's wrong with the offense? You get one pass in the pre-season, I guess, befor the hyenas start gathering. It would be better to avoid all that even if they really are going to suck.
__________________
This Monkey's Gone to Heaven
70Chip is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2007, 05:43 PM   #4
Beemnseven
Pro Bowl
 
Beemnseven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Age: 52
Posts: 5,311
Re: Mike Pucillo v. Todd Wade

Quote:
Originally Posted by 70Chip View Post
They have their work cut out again. I'd hate to have to pass block against those guys. They come from every which way. We shall see what happens. What I hate is that if they suck again it will be a full blown media thing this week. What's wrong with the offense? You get one pass in the pre-season, I guess, befor the hyenas start gathering. It would be better to avoid all that even if they really are going to suck.

Of course, the Redskins could solve that by coming out and kicking ass tonight. I guess that would be asking too much though, from this team.

In preseason, they always seem to give everybody watching plenty of reason for doubt.
Beemnseven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2007, 05:52 PM   #5
12thMan
MVP
 
12thMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,460
Re: Mike Pucillo v. Todd Wade

Quote:
Originally Posted by Beemnseven View Post
Of course, the Redskins could solve that by coming out and kicking ass tonight. I guess that would be asking too much though, from this team.

In preseason, they always seem to give everybody watching plenty of reason for doubt.
It seems we do give people something to talk about, don't we?

I would really like to see the offense put together two or three nice drives. Even if we don't score a ton of points, march down field for once.
12thMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2007, 07:59 PM   #6
Cowell
Impact Rookie
 
Cowell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Bluffton, South Carolina
Posts: 803
Re: Mike Pucillo v. Todd Wade

I say we put Mike Pucillo in over Todd Wade because Mike Pucillo is actually accustomed to being a guard.
Cowell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2007, 10:59 AM   #7
Pocket$ $traight
Registered User
 
Pocket$ $traight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fairfax, VA
Age: 50
Posts: 4,261
Re: Mike Pucillo v. Todd Wade

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cowell View Post
I say we put Mike Pucillo in over Todd Wade because Mike Pucillo is actually accustomed to being a guard.

I agree with you. The left side of the line looked good, at least in pass situations. When Samuels gets back they will start to pimpslap people.
Pocket$ $traight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2007, 12:49 AM   #8
Beemnseven
Pro Bowl
 
Beemnseven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Age: 52
Posts: 5,311
Re: Mike Pucillo v. Todd Wade

Yes, there was clear improvement from last week to tonight. Wasn't Campbell sacked like three times against the Titans in the first quarter or so?

There was far better O-line protection -- hopefully Pucillo is the missing piece of the puzzle.
Beemnseven is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.25112 seconds with 11 queries