![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Is todd wade really gonna start at LG?
So if we are getting Kendall, do we right away move Wade to starting LT until Samuels returns?
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Manassas
Age: 55
Posts: 3,048
|
Re: Is todd wade really gonna start at LG?
I would. But Coach just gave Heyer a ringing endorsement two days ago. Can we just forfeit our remaining pre-season games and wait for Samuels to get back?
__________________
This Monkey's Gone to Heaven |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
MVP
Join Date: May 2005
Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,460
|
Re: Is todd wade really gonna start at LG?
Quote:
I say they let Pucillo and Kendall duke it out at guard. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Burke, VA
Age: 49
Posts: 287
|
Re: Is todd wade really gonna start at LG?
Quote:
With PK at guard, Wade can shift back to his natural position and back-up Jansen. Some say Wade is better than Jansen, but regardless of who starts, you have high quality depth there. Hoyer is getting valuable experience and looks like he's got the goods to be a quality LT once he gets some more experience under his belt, which gives us solid depth at LT when Samuels comes back. Seems to me this acquisition solved more than one problem, and the cost was minimal (who would expect a 4th round draft pick to start at LG?). Obviously I am concerned about PK's contract affecting our ability to sign Cooley to the extension he deserves, but I have a feeling we'll work around that. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|