![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Doug Gabriel
Well I mentioned Gabriel a couple of days ago as a good option for the Redskins to go after. It's been pointed out,however, that his attitude isn't all that desirable. Could be a product of playing in Oakland, but then again he also played in New England and I think they released him mid-season.
Regardless of attitude though, I'd like to bring him in. He's a better choice for our 5th receiver spot than someone like Burl "Ives" Toler I would imagine. Unless Toler's been some kind of beast on special teams. Anyhow, this is all just speculation at this point.
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Manassas
Age: 55
Posts: 3,048
|
Re: Doug Gabriel
Quote:
__________________
This Monkey's Gone to Heaven |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
I like big (_|_)s.
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia
Age: 44
Posts: 19,264
|
Re: Doug Gabriel
Not to break your balls, but couldn't any WR we cut?
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Manassas
Age: 55
Posts: 3,048
|
Re: Doug Gabriel
Quote:
It was a little bit of a joke. Obviously not very effective. My position is this: If we only have 4 receivers worth keeping, that's all we should keep. Cooley is half wide-receiver anyway. And, we may be able to pick up a fifth once the axe falls on September 1.
__________________
This Monkey's Gone to Heaven |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Doug Gabriel
Quote:
I think he's better than Bradford at least, and given some time to get comfortbable would likely become our No. 2 WR. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Age: 52
Posts: 5,311
|
Re: Doug Gabriel
We also need to consider just how much playing time a 5th wide receiver would get. Since the Saunders Offense calls for tight ends and full backs, the game day roster will have at most 4 wideouts.
If there's any truth to this -- and that's a big if, you'd have to think that they're considering dumping either Thrash or Lloyd. I just don't see that happening. Especially when you consider the time Campbell has spent with the recievers he already has. I still can't figure out what the advantage is of a "possession" wideout who's over 6'2". Aren't all wide receivers "possession" receivers anyway? Everyone you throw to, you'd still like to have possession of the ball. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,540
|
Re: Doug Gabriel
Unless some gem happens to become available, I don't see much out there that could really change our wr situation. Are the coaches in fear of more injuries or do they really want to replace somebody? Loyd is the only dude I could see getting cut of the top 4 wr's, and I think they're trying to give him a chance to redeem himself. Plus the cap impact.
If R. Williams were to be available, he'd be a great addition, but as someone posted earlier talk of his release wasn't accurate. He's a good #2 wr. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Manassas
Age: 55
Posts: 3,048
|
Re: Doug Gabriel
Allow myself to quote...myself. He did a nice job of getting his feet down.
__________________
This Monkey's Gone to Heaven |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|