Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Looking ahead to Miami

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-30-2007, 09:37 AM   #1
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
Re: Looking ahead to Miami

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daseal View Post
Take a look at who has been throwing Chambers the ball. Also, the type of situations Chambers is often put in the position for jump balls and other highly contested balls because of his frame he will make fewer catches. I'm curious, where did you get those intended for stats?

I think it's foolish for us to underestimate Miami or act as if we're much better at this point. Both teams have squads full of question marks.
FOOTBALL OUTSIDERS: Football analysis and NFL stats for the Moneyball era - Authors of Pro Football Prospectus 2007

They call it catch %.

3-4 different QBs over those 3 seasons, and the numbers continue to be bad. At some point, we just have to blame Chambers.

I don't think we are a whole lot better than Miami at this point, but we should win this game.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2007, 01:12 PM   #2
70Chip
Playmaker
 
70Chip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Manassas
Age: 55
Posts: 3,048
Re: Looking ahead to Miami

Yeah, us being 3.5 point favorites at home means the oddsmakers think the two teams are pretty even.

In an opening day situation, I think more games are lost than are won. So, the redskins need to take care of the football, play disciplined, get pressure to force Miami into mistakes, win on special teams, and they should come out on top.

I suspect Cameron will have some pretty good blitz-beating plays in the mix so we need the secondary to be sure and wrap up the receivers as soon as the ball is delivered. We struggled last year with letting hot receivers out of the gate for big plays (think Maurice Jones-Drew). We need individuals in the secondary to step up to the mic.
__________________
This Monkey's Gone to Heaven
70Chip is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2007, 02:37 PM   #3
hooskins
Most Interesting Man in the World
 
hooskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Age: 39
Posts: 8,606
Re: Looking ahead to Miami

I actually predicted a lost to the Viks last year and about a 8-8 or 9-7 record. I thought we were overhyped, but I didnt expect to go 5-11. I think our D and run game will hold us agaisnt the Fins. I feel an 9-7 to and 11-5 potential this year, but I'm not overly optimistic.
__________________
Vacancy
hooskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2007, 03:14 PM   #4
Beemnseven
Pro Bowl
 
Beemnseven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Age: 52
Posts: 5,311
Re: Looking ahead to Miami

Since it appears both teams have question marks, this one will probably come down to who turns it over more.

I'd agree the Skins and Dolphins are two very similar teams. For Miami, new coach, new quarterback (for their system), aging defense -- for us, question marks on both offensive and defensive lines, aging defense, but more time for our quarterback in the system.

Looks like we have a slight edge, but then, I thought the same thing about Minnesota last year. Don't forget though, Gibbs is cursed in Monday Night Football season openers -- he's like 0-4 or something like that. This one is on Sunday, though. So that's a good thing.
Beemnseven is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 1.10005 seconds with 11 queries