![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
I like big (_|_)s.
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia
Age: 44
Posts: 19,264
|
Re: Why It's Not as Simple as Ws vs Ls
Is it just me or is it the fact we lost to the Giants at home the reason it stings so much?
MOST of us expected to be 2-1 at this juncture anyway. Would we be singing the same tune if we had lost to the Eagles and beaten the Giants? We'd still be at 2-1.
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: 129 W 81st street
Age: 47
Posts: 3,503
|
Re: Why It's Not as Simple as Ws vs Ls
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
A Dude
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Newtown Square, PA
Age: 46
Posts: 12,458
|
Re: Why It's Not as Simple as Ws vs Ls
I prefer to think you're only as good as your NEXT game.
__________________
God made certain people to play football. He was one of them. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Arlington Va.
Age: 49
Posts: 837
|
Re: Why It's Not as Simple as Ws vs Ls
Quote:
I think it was the fact of how the skins lost, they showed so much promise in the first half, only to lose a game which they should have won. This "protect the lead" conservative game that JG gibbs (and staff) plays is almost like a prevent def, attacking the other team is what got you the lead, continue to attack til its over.
__________________
The NEXT special teams coordinator |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: chesapeake, va
Age: 62
Posts: 15,817
|
Re: Why It's Not as Simple as Ws vs Ls
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|