Is Kurt Warner back?

[jsarno]

Originally Posted by TheBigD

I doubt that is the reason, when Bledsoe was the QB, the O line for Dallas looked horrible, Romo came in and all of a sudden they are not that bad (talking about last year). Same thing could be said abour Burnell and Campbell.

So why do you think that is?

Your logic doesn't make much sense either. All I am saying is, the Titans had a say in why they won the game. You say they went for it on 4th down. Why did they have to wait till the 4th down to convert. There were 3 other downs for them to get 10 yards, but the Titans stopped them.

So you're saying that every team should be without a kicker, cause if they can't convert and score a TD on every possession they aren't as good as the other team? Teams have a kicker for a reason, and field goals are in the game for a reason. It's a big and valuable piece of the game...if you were a Skins fan, you'd realize that cause our kickers lost us many game in the past 3-10 years. I would think you would know that given that you had kicker troubles a couple years ago.

Neither am I, but I have to say that Young is better than both (as hard as it is for me to say that because I went to VT). No one thinks he is the second coming of Jesus, but he is a good player.

Not yet he's not. He COULD be, but that's an "if" for another discussion. Trust me, the way the media exhaults this kid and the way he could do no wrong in Nashville...people think he's the second coming of Jesus alright. I am pretty sure he has a better head on his shoulders than most rookies though, so that bodes well for him.

LOL, so what pretty much anyone's number could beat Young's, that is not saying much. The number that matters the most after it is all said and done is the Ws. I am not jumping on Young's or Leinarts bandwagon, but out of the two, Young is better.[/QUOTE]

You definitely have a point, it's the W's. So what will you say if the Titans win only 6 or 7 games? (my prediction 8 max, but likely 7.)