![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Swearinger
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 12,626
|
Re: Why Doesn't "Gibbs' Football" Work for the Redskins?
All I said was they caught their share of passes. You have to play to your strengths. Gibbs drafted Cooley before Saunders was even on our radar. He's been our most consistent weapon in the passing game. I know traditional "Gibbs" football has a block 1st TE, but he brought in Saunders for a reason, and the TE plays a very prominent role in his offense.
__________________
Tardy |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 31 Spooner St.
Age: 51
Posts: 9,534
|
Re: Why Doesn't "Gibbs' Football" Work for the Redskins?
Quote:
I will say this though...remember the Spurrier era here? The send everyone out to catch and skrew blocking era? I guess I am just more hesitant to put Cooley out to catch when our O line is hurting. I know we need him to catch and open up the offense, but we need blocking too.
__________________
Zoltan is ZESTY! - courtesy of joeredskin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Swearinger
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 12,626
|
Re: Why Doesn't "Gibbs' Football" Work for the Redskins?
Quote:
__________________
Tardy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 31 Spooner St.
Age: 51
Posts: 9,534
|
Re: Why Doesn't "Gibbs' Football" Work for the Redskins?
Quote:
I like the idea of two TE sets though. Let Yoder block...he can't really catch well. LOL.
__________________
Zoltan is ZESTY! - courtesy of joeredskin |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|