Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Interesting Packers Stat...

Locker Room Main Forum


 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 10-12-2007, 02:52 PM   #25
Monkeydad
Living Legend
 
Monkeydad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 46
Posts: 17,460
Re: Interesting Packers Stat...

Quote:
Originally Posted by warriorzpath View Post
Interesting stat, I just don't like the idea of tearing down an opponent's success to feel good about the redskins chances. That's underestimating the opponent and having a lack of respect for them. At least a couple of the Packers' opponents on defense have played great in past seasons and still employ the same scheme and have most of their personnel.
No one is tearing them down.

They have a good offense, so far, despite the weak opponents. Their passing game is tops in the league and their running game is next-to-last, ranked #31. Our offense is in the top half of the league, more balanced with rushing and passing, doing fairly well in both.

We have one of the top defenses in the league, FAR better than theirs (us 3rd, them 17th and surrender 60 more yards a game than us.


Defense will decide the game and going by stats and the season so far, we have a BIG advantage, especially with their CBs not being healthy: Blackmon - out (foot), Harris - probable (Back), Woodson - probable (foot)
Monkeydad is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 1.49224 seconds with 11 queries