Focus Your Negative Energy- Pats-Cowgirls Thread

[TheBigD]

Originally Posted by sandtrapjack

This is a loss I, and most, expected. But chances are that Dallas will enter thier bye week at the seasons half-way mark at 6-1. And that is not too shabby.

I do not understand how they can be so concerned about how Dallas does when the fact of the matter is Washington has dropped 2 of it's last 3 games.

Yeah, but they 1. Hate Dallas 2. The more games Dallas loses the better chance the Skins have at winning the East.

Thing is, with this loss to GB, it makes you wonder how good is the Skins offense. Would they have lost 3 in a row if was a decent team defensivley, not the Lions?

[ArtMonkDrillz]

Originally Posted by TheBigD

Yeah, but they 1. Hate Dallas 2. The more games Dallas loses the better chance the Skins have at winning the East.

Thing is, with this loss to GB, it makes you wonder how good is the Skins offense. Would they have lost 3 in a row if was a decent team defensivley, not the Lions?

I agree with the first part. If we're the only team to beat dallas and they go 14-2 they still win the division, so we need them to rack up a couple of extra losses.

But I don't agree with your second paragraph. You guys were quick to defend your record against people who said you only beat crappy teams because you have to play whoever is on your schedule. You can't start saying crap like "would they have lost 3 in a row if was a decent team defensivley, not the Lions" because the fact of the matter is that we did play the lions. There is no logic in that kind of thinking.
I have to wonder what your record would be if you didn't have romo, owens, barber, and witten. You may have lost 6 in a row!

[TheBigD]

Originally Posted by ArtMonkDrillz

But I don't agree with your second paragraph. You guys were quick to defend your record against people who said you only beat crappy teams because you have to play whoever is on your schedule. You can't start saying crap like "would they have lost 3 in a row if was a decent team defensivley, not the Lions" because the fact of the matter is that we did play the lions. There is no logic in that kind of thinking.
I have to wonder what your record would be if you didn't have romo, owens, barber, and witten. You may have lost 6 in a row!

LOL, take it easy, I was just wondering. I say that because it must be frustrating having such a good D and be crippled with the kind of offense that took the field yesterday. I was merely asking, was it the Lions having a bad D or the Redskins offense was actually that good? Did they improve from the second half against the Giants to what they were against the Lions and then got worse yesterday? Or have they been the same and the Lions game was, well, the Lions being the Lions?