![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Wildcard Bitches
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Bethesda, MD
Age: 41
Posts: 2,638
|
Re: Lloyd Comments to the Junks
![]() I'm sick of hearing about Lloyd. His production/attention ratio is off the charts. He will not be in Washington next season, and I wonder if he'll be anywhere else.
__________________
This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps! |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: sparta, new jersey [ northern jersey ]
Age: 62
Posts: 3,097
|
Re: Lloyd Comments to the Junks
He will be in New England, or Indianapolis catching TD's, his mouth is what has kept him from endearing himself to Gibbs, I just don't think Gibbs wants anything to do with him at this point, and I wouldn't blame it all on Lloyd, I think if they focused him in the passing game he would be very productive, but I get the feeling Gibbs would rather get that production from others. I get the feeling he shot his mouth off last year about our passing game or lack there of, which probably ticked Gibbs off, so as long as you have WR's like ARL, and Moss, there's no need to throw Lloyd into the game plan, although with the lack of ability Moss has shown to catch a simple pass this season Gibbs has to be close to increasing Lloyds playing time. Mcardell is a nice addition but he's not a #2, same goes for Thrash, Lloyd is if used properly. There is I believe a real pissing match going on right now between Gibbs and Lloyd and Lloyd ain't winning that one, at least not in DC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Apr 2005
Age: 51
Posts: 1,961
|
Re: Lloyd Comments to the Junks
How much dead cap space is that guy going to cost the team next year?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Lloyd Comments to the Junks
Quote:
They build their teams on undervalued talent, not overvalued crap.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,591
|
Re: Lloyd Comments to the Junks
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: sparta, new jersey [ northern jersey ]
Age: 62
Posts: 3,097
|
Re: Lloyd Comments to the Junks
Quote:
Lloyd wasnt a lousy WR before he came to us, and he looks to be in the best shape of his life at this point. Fans just can't admit that it may not always be the player it could very well be the coaching and the players around them, or in other words the team that they are so endeared to! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: So. MD
Age: 47
Posts: 1,319
|
Re: Lloyd Comments to the Junks
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: The Southeast
Age: 42
Posts: 2,119
|
Re: Lloyd Comments to the Junks
Quote:
He's athletic and probably has great potential, but his stats through his first four seasons in the NFL simply do not bear out that he's much of anything at this point. His highest total in a season is 733 yards and hasn't caught more than six TDs in a season. It's not like he had a real standout season at one point and we're all hoping he will reach that level again. He's never BEEN at the level before. Hell, through his first four years Lloyd has 13 TDs. There are a number of WRs in this league who put up those numbers in a single season, not four. If he wants to get paid like a bigshot WR, and talk like a bigshot WR, he better start putting up some stats or just shut his mouth and take a much smaller paycheck. Anyone arguing that Lloyd is a top-flight WR and is being held back by coaches, trainers, bad circumstances, a poor diet, the janitor who looked askance at him or his homophobia is simply basing it on conjecture and hope because his statistical production proves otherwise.
__________________
Your post count, reputation score, popularity ranking, VIP tag or funny signature has no bearing on how I value you as an individual. Last edited by mheisig; 10-16-2007 at 05:36 PM. Reason: Typos |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: sparta, new jersey [ northern jersey ]
Age: 62
Posts: 3,097
|
Re: Lloyd Comments to the Junks
Quote:
You site receivers who have all pro QB's, something Lloyd has not come close to, what were Randy Moss's stats last season without a QB? Oakland said he had a chronic knee problem and is not the WR he used to be, I guess they were right he's better than he used to be, the question is why? Could it be the team and the QB? So if there is nothing there in Lloyd why did Gibbs have to have this guy? Sorry but playing in an inept system like San fran, and then coming over to us only to have the likes of Brunell throwing to him doesn't make him a bust, every time I see the guy he's beating his man down field. If you want to say he doesn't fit in, then fine, because that pretty much seems to be whats going on here, but he can't throw the ball to himself. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: The Southeast
Age: 42
Posts: 2,119
|
Re: Lloyd Comments to the Junks
Quote:
In 29 games with Oakland, Moss had 102 catches for 1,558 yards and 11 TDs. In 45 games with San Francisco, Lloyd had 105 catches for 1,510 yards and 13 TDs. In other words, with equally poor QBs in Oakland and San Francisco during those years, Moss's worst numbers of his career beat out Lloyd's best production of his career. Anquan Boldin and Larry Fitzgerald having been catching passes from arguably some of the worst QBs in the NFL down in Arizona, and their worst season numbers are better than Lloyd's best. Lloyd simply does not stack up against any good #1 or even #2 WR in this league, even when you compare virtually identical situations with bad teams and bad QBs. I could see an argument for not comparing him to Marvin Harrison, but you can pick plenty of WRs in the NFL who are catching passes from QBs far worse than Brunell and/or Campbell yet still putting up numbers that shame Brandon Lloyd. There is simply no factual, statistically supported basis for believing Lloyd is a good WR. If you want to sit here and raise vague, baseless questions about why Gibbs did what he did, and maybe it's the system and maybe it's the QB and maybe it's a bad pair of shoes or there's just someone out to get Lloyd, I suppose we could do that all day. Anyone can sit around and raise questions. If you believe that Lloyd is a good receiver then back it up with something other than pure conjecture.
__________________
Your post count, reputation score, popularity ranking, VIP tag or funny signature has no bearing on how I value you as an individual. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,591
|
Re: Lloyd Comments to the Junks
Quote:
No way he is on NE next year. Their number one pick from last year, Chad Jackson can't even get on the field. Lloyd will be a full time rapper next year. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|