Kurt Warner to Miss Skins Game

[MTK]

Rattay scares people??

C'mon now.

Let's stop being ridiculous.

[Southpaw]

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

Rattay scares people??

C'mon now.

Let's stop being ridiculous.

He's got a scary 80.3 lifetime rating and is on his third team in three years... That's how legends are made.

[GTripp0012]

Originally Posted by Southpaw

He's got a scary 80.3 lifetime rating and is on his third team in three years... That's how legends are made.

80.3 is good. That's better than Campbell thus far. And he's probably even better than his passer rating but I'd have to look at it and see how it broke down.

[MTK]

Originally Posted by GTripp0012

80.3 is good. That's better than Campbell thus far. And he's probably even better than his passer rating but I'd have to look at it and see how it broke down.

An 80.3 rating funny enough puts a QB in the Joey Harrington range, which would be the 21st ranked QB in the league.

[GTripp0012]

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

An 80.3 rating funny enough puts a QB in the Joey Harrington range, which would be the 21st ranked QB in the league.

Um, no.

Joey Harrington has a career rating of 69.1. His rating this year is 80.3, but thats over 6 games and you can't just use that number as if its classic Joey Harrington. Classic Harrington is 69.1, way worse than 80.3.

It's also a very pass happy year for quarterbacks, so 80.1 this year is not as good as 80.1 career is. So that may rank 21st in the league, but chances are that given 6 games, Rattay would likely be between 85-90 in QB rating based on in-year adjustments.

Which, again is good. Not great, good.

[MTK]

Originally Posted by GTripp0012

Um, no.

Joey Harrington has a career rating of 69.1. His rating this year is 80.3, but thats over 6 games and you can't just use that number as if its classic Joey Harrington. Classic Harrington is 69.1, way worse than 80.3.

I was referring to this season, not career wise.

[12thMan]

Originally Posted by GTripp0012

Um, no.

Joey Harrington has a career rating of 69.1. His rating this year is 80.3, but thats over 6 games and you can't just use that number as if its classic Joey Harrington. Classic Harrington is 69.1, way worse than 80.3.

GT, so what is the crux of this argument? That Rattay is better than we think or that he's underated?

This is an average Joe with some respectable stats - that's it. Like I said earlier, he's capable of playing like Peyton Manning this Sunday, but it's certainly not anything anyone should be expecting at this point. The guy was at home watching NFL Network two weeks ago, and he get's called near the mid point of the season. And I'll bet the longer he plays this year, the lower that QB rating drops. At this point, he what he is.

[Southpaw]

Originally Posted by GTripp0012

80.3 is good. That's better than Campbell thus far. And he's probably even better than his passer rating but I'd have to look at it and see how it broke down.

80.3 is solid, but I wouldn't call it good. If he were a starter at this point in the season, he'd be the 19th-20th rated passer. And I'm not saying that he completely sucks, but being thrown into the mix with a week to build some kind of chemistry with the receivers AND prepare for the Redskins defense should definitely be considered, Advantage: Redskins.

[12thMan]

Originally Posted by Southpaw

80.3 is solid, but I wouldn't call it good. If he were a starter at this point in the season, he'd be the 19th-20th rated passer. And I'm not saying that he completely sucks, but being thrown into the mix with a week to build some kind of chemistry with the receivers AND prepare for the Redskins defense should definitely be considered, Advantage: Redskins.

Unless we're still reeling from the Green Bay loss, we should rattle the hell out of this guy.