Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Cardinals vs Redskins game thread

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-21-2007, 04:15 PM   #1
DynamiteRave
Living Legend
 
DynamiteRave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Washington DC
Age: 39
Posts: 16,867
Re: Cardinals vs Redskins game thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by GusFrerotte View Post
This team is a disaster on offense. Al Saunders sucks ass!!! Our WR corp sucks ass!!!!!!! Our QB looked totally inadequate today. We are looking at last place in our division unless we can get our act together.
I agree.. I am a little iffy on Saunders now.

Our WR don't suck, they just can't catch. Well... I guess that would make them a little sucky. I was upset that Moss didn't get more catches especially after that poor GB game. So I guess we have to wait till next week to see if he'll bounce back.

The only reason JC didn't look great was because he didn't open it up very much and when he did, they were dropping passes.

Last place in the division... I dunno. I don't think so. Our defense is too good. If the offense doesn't win games then the defense will (like today)

I think we may look at a wildcard position at best.
__________________
Establishment, establishment, you always know what's best.

I've been a part of this message board for 17 years. Damn I'm old.
DynamiteRave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2007, 04:17 PM   #2
NYCSkin
Impact Rookie
 
NYCSkin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: San Diego, CA
Age: 54
Posts: 513
Re: Cardinals vs Redskins game thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by DynamiteRave View Post
I agree.. I am a little iffy on Saunders now.

Our WR don't suck, they just can't catch. Well... I guess that would make them a little sucky. I was upset that Moss didn't get more catches especially after that poor GB game. So I guess we have to wait till next week to see if he'll bounce back.

The only reason JC didn't look great was because he didn't open it up very much and when he did, they were dropping passes.

Last place in the division... I dunno. I don't think so. Our defense is too good. If the offense doesn't win games then the defense will (like today)

I think we may look at a wildcard position at best.
When you say wildcard--you mean next year right?
NYCSkin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2007, 04:19 PM   #3
DynamiteRave
Living Legend
 
DynamiteRave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Washington DC
Age: 39
Posts: 16,867
Re: Cardinals vs Redskins game thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by NYCSkin View Post
When you say wildcard--you mean next year right?
Haha, it's really looking like that lately.
__________________
Establishment, establishment, you always know what's best.

I've been a part of this message board for 17 years. Damn I'm old.
DynamiteRave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2007, 04:23 PM   #4
GusFrerotte
Registered User
 
GusFrerotte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Detroit area
Posts: 4,153
Re: Cardinals vs Redskins game thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by DynamiteRave View Post
I agree.. I am a little iffy on Saunders now.

Our WR don't suck, they just can't catch. Well... I guess that would make them a little sucky. I was upset that Moss didn't get more catches especially after that poor GB game. So I guess we have to wait till next week to see if he'll bounce back.

The only reason JC didn't look great was because he didn't open it up very much and when he did, they were dropping passes.

Last place in the division... I dunno. I don't think so. Our defense is too good. If the offense doesn't win games then the defense will (like today)

I think we may look at a wildcard position at best.
We already lost to the Gmen, forget beating the Boys at all and the Eagles are an improved team somewhat from the one we beat on MNF. If our O line was intact I would say we would be a 2nd place team for sure, but not how things have looked the past 2 weeks. WR production is terrible this season. Llyod hasn't been on the radar screen all season, and now Santana decides to start dropping off the screen now also. I still say give McCardell some more playing time. The guy is a gamer and we need production now.
GusFrerotte is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2007, 04:26 PM   #5
DynamiteRave
Living Legend
 
DynamiteRave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Washington DC
Age: 39
Posts: 16,867
Re: Cardinals vs Redskins game thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by GusFrerotte View Post
We already lost to the Gmen, forget beating the Boys at all and the Eagles are an improved team somewhat from the one we beat on MNF. If our O line was intact I would say we would be a 2nd place team for sure, but not how things have looked the past 2 weeks. WR production is terrible this season. Llyod hasn't been on the radar screen all season, and now Santana decides to start dropping off the screen now also. I still say give McCardell some more playing time. The guy is a gamer and we need production now.
Yes! I completely agree. McCardell has been put in when we need big 1st down gains. He only has 2 or 3 catches but he caught them!

Why they don't give this man more playing time I don't know! What the hell is the point of getting McCardell and Caldwell when you're not gonna freakin use them?
__________________
Establishment, establishment, you always know what's best.

I've been a part of this message board for 17 years. Damn I'm old.
DynamiteRave is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 1.77468 seconds with 11 queries