Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


What's your defnition of 'conservative playcalling'?

Locker Room Main Forum


 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 10-22-2007, 09:42 PM   #14
Paintrain
Pro Bowl
 
Paintrain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Age: 55
Posts: 5,006
Re: What's your defnition of 'conservative playcalling'?

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsguy View Post
The real argument against conservative playcalling is that fans want to be entertained. That's what it really comes down to. Fans would rather see us lose 45-42 in overtime than to see us win 21-19 with the defense scoring at least a TD here and there. I guess they feel as if they're not getting their money's worth. Well, sorry, but I'd rather see us win ugly than to see us lose pretty.
Nice job of taking all of the logic out of a reasonable discussion.. The bottom line is we all want to win games but would enjoy not sweating out a victory of a game that we've dominated for 2.5 quarters but then decided to ease off the pedal and coast the rest of the way hoping to bleed the lead. Winning ugly is fine, but winning decisively is better..
__________________
Paintrain's Redskins Fandom
1981-2014

I'm not dead but this team is dead to me...but now that McCloughan is here they may have new life!

Jay Gruden = Zorny McSpurrier
Kirk Cousins = Next Grossman
Paintrain is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 1.00674 seconds with 11 queries