Are we 4-2 because of Gibbs, or in spite of him?

[TheMalcolmConnection]

For those of you who want Gibbs to let Saunders have complete autonomy in the offensive gameplanning, do you remember when he first came here and they were running about thirty reverses a game? Gibbs is the overwhelming yin to Saunder's yang.

Yes, I said yang, not wang.

[Monkeydad]

Originally Posted by TheMalcolmConnection

For those of you who want Gibbs to let Saunders have complete autonomy in the offensive gameplanning, do you remember when he first came here and they were running about thirty reverses a game? Gibbs is the overwhelming yin to Saunder's yang.

Yes, I said yang, not wang.

I could go for that gameplan against NE.

Randel El, Moss if he holds onto the ball, Portis, heck even Lloyd could run those plays well.

On the other plays, we either throw long bombs or hand it to Big Mike.

[TheMalcolmConnection]

Originally Posted by Buster

I could go for that gameplan against NE.

Randel El, Moss if he holds onto the ball, Portis, heck even Lloyd could run those plays well.

On the other plays, we either throw long bombs or hand it to Big Mike.

I would actually really like Sellers to get a good amount of carries. I'm talking maybe 10-15.

[irish]

Originally Posted by TheMalcolmConnection

For those of you who want Gibbs to let Saunders have complete autonomy in the offensive gameplanning, do you remember when he first came here and they were running about thirty reverses a game? Gibbs is the overwhelming yin to Saunder's yang.

Yes, I said yang, not wang.

IMO, Gibbs help AS and GW keep from killing each other. I think if Gibbs ever stepped down then either GW or AS would go because I just dont think they could work together. Gibbs is the buffer