Trading #85

WaldSkins · 10-25-2007, 03:18 PM

i still say we are good enough at reciever.

skinsfan69 · 10-26-2007, 09:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WaldSkins

i still say we are good enough at reciever.

what have you seen so far that makes you say that? we need wr's in the worst way. but ocho cinco is not coming here.

Cowell · 10-27-2007, 01:24 PM

Good point about the running back. If Portis decides to try free agency which I can see him doing we could have some issues there. Betts isn't showing the explosiveness he had BEFORE his big contract.

That Guy · 10-28-2007, 12:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cowell

Good point about the running back. If Portis decides to try free agency which I can see him doing we could have some issues there. Betts isn't showing the explosiveness he had BEFORE his big contract.

he doesn't have the oline he did before the contract and he's only getting like 8 carries a game. and, uh, the contract was really tiny... almost shockingly so for his production last year.

10-25-2007, 03:18 PM	#1
WaldSkins Playmaker Join Date: May 2007 Location: Harrisburg, PA Age: 43 Posts: 2,726	Re: Trading #85 i still say we are good enough at reciever.

10-27-2007, 01:24 PM	#3
Cowell Impact Rookie Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Bluffton, South Carolina Posts: 803	Re: Trading #85 Good point about the running back. If Portis decides to try free agency which I can see him doing we could have some issues there. Betts isn't showing the explosiveness he had BEFORE his big contract.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Trading #85

Locker Room Main Forum