![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Maybe It's Not Just The O-Line
Quote:
I don't think anyone is trying to argue that really successful or really awful running games aren't to the credit or fault of their respective offensive lines. But I'd like to take dgack's argument in a different direction for a second. So much of what an offensive line does is executed within the first seven yards of the play. No lineman or TE goes downfield to block a safety. Therefore, once the back gets through the LB level, he's own his own out there. Well, the 2006 Redskins have fewer than 5 runs over ten yards this year. No runs over 20 yards. If you truncate long runs across the league, the Redskins run blocking actually comes out pretty average (ALY is my stat of reference). Granted this ALY ranking is at a three year low for us (for obvious reasons). However, our YPC ranks 30th in the league only ahead of Chicago and Houston. Portis' YPC is higher than the teams YPC, but he also has more than 2/3 of the teams' carries. He's not creating big plays even when he has blocking. Here's the point: even with injuries, plenty of teams have worse offensive lines than us. Wade and Fabini have not been bad in the run game. Fabini has been a pleasant surprise overall. But Portis isn't reading the holes well and he's not creating any yards beyond what a typical run-of-the-mill back would be. Now whether Betts can be better is an enitrely different discussion, but I will say this: if he's not capable of doing any better, we really shouldn't be wasting plays running the football.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|