![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 359
|
Re: F... Kool-Aid
How about this:
JC will have a great game if Gibbs/Saunders put the ball in his hands like last week. He is ready to assume those responsibilities on a regular basis and his playcalling, based on what little history we have, is more dynamic (really I mean less predictable). JC will have a constrained, ineffective game if SOMEBODY else calls the plays. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
A Dude
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Newtown Square, PA
Age: 46
Posts: 12,458
|
Re: F... Kool-Aid
Quote:
__________________
God made certain people to play football. He was one of them. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 359
|
Re: F... Kool-Aid
Quote:
). Putting the ball in JC's hands should give us far better offensive production, as it did last Sunday. But the defense has to play 4 qtrs of intense ball to give as any shot at a W. Something they did not do last Sunday. Which leads me to this thought: Landry played FS in college and was very dangerous. W/ Taylor out would it make sense to throw Landry back there? I bring it up because Praylow did not look effective as GW's center fielder, but he has looked very sharp coming in for Landry at SS. I could see Landry in center field because he's very fast and probably makes TO more nervous than Praylow would as FS, and Praylow taking over at SS. I've been thinking about this since Sunday and it just keeps making more sense. Landry was so effective at FS his senior year opposing QBs rarely threw deep on LSU. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|